The term "barn burning" has become a bit popular recently. I think: one party is looking for pleasure, the other is seeking profit, let's just consider what each needs. There is no question of who is more valuable than the other. If I have to condemn it, it would be to add the word "love". But is that considered sacred love? I used to think it didn't count, it was just emotional resonance and a short-term thing. If you get separated, turn around, the next one will be better. Later I discovered: It is not because I have experienced too much that I am open-minded, but because I have fallen from the clouds to the bottom, so I am easily satisfied. But being easily satisfied also means uncertainty. After a long time, you should finally break away...
The novel is about a male and female protagonist who pass by each other, and later become entangled with each other for one purpose or another (including revenge). It is basically a modern story about falling in love at first sight and staying together when they see each other again. But if that's all it is, it will inevitably be monotonous!
So behind the story is actually a long-planned "accident". Everyone made the big thing trivial, and the victim also rationalized all these "accidents" because of the ambiguous tone attached to it... It was originally possible to let everything go, but since there was a male protagonist, the female protagonist's life has become more lively, so break free and restart.
The story is divided into two parts, (Part 1) has bright emotions and (Part 2) has a thick plot. There are many emotional terms, such as 2+1, supporting relationship, things in the palm of your hand... The plot is based on scraps of social news, and the logic may be far-fetched, so there is no need to substitute it for understanding.
The story is connected with the author's previous novel, which is reflected in the emotional layer.
