I Am Here************

The major poisonous points of this novel are revealed: 1. The rhythm is too chaotic, mainly reflected in the timeline. This time span often occurs a few days later, even months later, or half a year later. Especially after the opening of the seventh chapter, the New Year was supposed to be the time for the protagonist to get rich and spend money and enjoy life, but he simply skipped it and went directly to start a career and invest in fisheries... In just a few dozen chapters, the conflict quickly rose from daily life to hatred between country and family. It was too exaggerated and lacked details of life. In just over 50 chapters, the protagonist has almost turned two countries upside down. 2. The protagonist is often led around. Basically, the villain pretends to be cool, and the protagonist responds, or simply holds back for a while, and then suddenly shows off his strength. There is a lack of conflict escalation process, which may lead to the development of the plot being not so continuous. If the villain really thinks that the protagonist is rubbish, he will not take the initiative to upgrade his character and increase his taunting intensity. A little taunting will be fine. After being bullied, the protagonist should take the initiative to fight back step by step, and then he will be ridiculed to a greater extent by the villain, and the final slap in the face will be very satisfying. It should be that the protagonist was bullied, so he immediately put on his bad disguise, played with the villain's emotions by walking the dog, and took the initiative to upgrade his bad temper step by step until the villain was convinced. 3. Lack of logic. It appears in the plot that the way to punish the villain is to acquire his company. But I never thought about it, after acquiring other people's companies, to whom will the funds flow? It is suggested that the son of someone else's old chairman comes out to show off. In order to retaliate against this guy, the protagonist directly acquires his parents' company, and then fires him as a major shareholder. Moreover, the money given after the acquisition did not belong to that boy, and he had no right to control the funds. Doesn't it mean that if you use money to acquire someone else's company, the original chairman is done with it? Can't someone else rely on the money from selling the company to make a comeback? The mayor is mentioned in the plot. If the company is owned by the government, it can also be set up to acquire the company owned by the government, or the state-owned enterprise becomes a private enterprise, and then use the status of the major shareholder to fire the troublemaker, and it is impossible for him to get money.

I couldn't stand the first one I watched. The main character's reaction skills were so poor that he was being led around by others.