The Wizard and His Dragon

Regarding bullying by supporting characters, I don't understand the mechanism of the paragraph comment. There are no special words, and it disappeared as soon as it was posted. Let's just say that I was disgusted at the beginning. I posted a paragraph comment a few minutes ago, but it was deleted when I went back to read it. It mainly commented on the bullying behavior of the character Sirise, and several paragraphs were completely gone. 🌟Process First of all, after the protagonist became a disciple, he was attacked by a man-made attack when he went to the magic tower. Because he had a token, the protagonist was not injured at all. He was only mentally shocked and needed to rest. Entering the tower later, she was suddenly attacked by fireballs. When the protagonist was about to dodge in a panic, the dragon in her body fought back. Then the teacher stopped her and said she was rude to the guests. Siris said that the protagonist was not injured anyway. The teacher asked her to apologize to the protagonist later, and then told the protagonist that fireballs would explode into fireworks when they hit her and would not be hurt. Siris had no father since she was a child and was raised by him at the age of 6. She is not bad in nature, but he spoiled her because of his poor discipline. I hope the protagonist can forgive me. At this time, the author made a fair statement from the teacher. 🌟Conclusion Personally, I think Siris is showing off her power by arbitrarily manipulating the defensive magic outside the magic tower to attack the protagonist. How can she be sure that the protagonist must have a token on him to defend him? Because she has the teacher to protect her, she is unscrupulous. After coming in, she used accelerating magic to throw fireballs at the protagonist. If the dragon in the protagonist's body didn't wake up, he could only run away with his head in his arms. Not to mention fireworks, the protagonist didn't know that all he saw were fireballs. What kind of identity did she have to play tricks on strangers? The teacher has a new apprentice. Isn't her attitude bullying? Anyway, it is a typical statement that the protagonist is not injured. The teacher was not there when the protagonist was bullied. After Long fought back, the teacher suddenly appeared and stopped her, saying that she was rude to the guests. At this time, the two apprentices, the old and the new, and the new apprentice was the guest, already showed the teacher's attitude. It was obvious who the teacher was partial to. After leaving, the teacher first paid for Sirise's misfortune. She had no father since she was a child, and her uncle didn't care. Then he said that she was spoiled by him. Sirise was not bad in nature, but he was not good at discipline. After taking the responsibility on himself, he also said that he hoped that the protagonist would give her a chance when Sirise apologized. . . Doesn't this imply that the protagonist should not embarrass Siris? Regarding this speech, the author commented that the teacher was very fair and treated the two people fairly and impartially, without any favoritism. I would say it was just short of coercion and inducement, but not partiality. The teacher had already opened his mouth and gave up the opportunity. What else could the protagonist say? When there were outrageous remarks, I made separate comments. I suddenly found that the teacher's comment had disappeared as soon as I posted it. I went back and looked through the previous comments and they were all gone. I just wanted to say that if you create such a persona, don't whitewash it. Otherwise, don't write like this. Being teased and targeted in a new place can be whitewashed as a joke. The teacher's favoritism can also be called fair and impartial. I won't say what the three views are. Everyone can make up their own mind. 🤭🤭🤭

Nice!ヾ(●´∇`●)ﾉWow~

Why isn't the dragon female? No wonder it's so popular. You got off to a bad start when you first started writing.