The original style of the "Huayang Guozhi" written by Changzhu of the Jin Dynasty is rather chaotic. There are many printed and banknote editions in the past dynasties, but there are many mistakes, distortions, distortions and distortions. Ren Naiqiang's "Huayang Guozhi Corrected and Illustrated Annotations" and Liu Lin's "Huayang Guozhi Corrected and Illustrated Annotations" have been well organized, but there are still conflicts and inconsistencies. This book adopts a chronological style, breaking up the whole book into several sections, arranged according to the era; the first four histories are used as the main evidence, and other books are used as circumstantial evidence; Ren, Liu, and other books are used as circumstantial evidence; the similarities and differences of the text and historical facts are presented in the annotations of Ren, Liu, and others; it is combined with unearthed documents, Official and unofficial history and newer research results are used to verify politics, economy, people, nations, deeds, geography, customs, frontiers, etc. If the date cannot be determined through textual research, they will be listed separately in the form of "suspicious records" to wait for the future.
Reader comments
This book is amazing! The author spent a lot of effort to reorganize "Huayang Guozhi" in a chronological style, and also combined many other materials for textual research. I especially like this rigorous academic attitude. People like me who have children should read more books like this to set a good example for their children. It's just that the examination content is too professional, so I had to read it slowly. However, what I hate the most is the kind of half-hearted person who pretends to understand even though he doesn't understand. This book is definitely worth reading!
This book is amazing! The author spent a lot of effort to reorganize "Huayang Guozhi" in a chronological style, and also combined many other materials for textual research. I especially like this rigorous academic attitude. People like me who have children should read more books like this to set a good example for their children. It's just that the examination content is too professional, so I had to read it slowly. However, what I hate the most is the kind of half-hearted person who pretends to understand even though he doesn't understand. This book is definitely worth reading!