Live Broadcast Dispels Historical Rumors

The writing is very good and objective. There is no brainless flattery or brainless slander. For example, there is no such thing as King Zhou and the last human emperor. There is also no such thing as Ying Zheng's death and the world will not be in chaos. It is really objective. Even modern people think about people in history from TV novels. They have never read any historical books and have no judgment. They think that they have read a few novels and they are some great historians.

Great, great. In all dynasties, nationalism, ancient militarism, and extreme populism are rampant. Someone actually wrote this, that's awesome bro.

Very good, relatively objective evaluation. Unlike most novels which are too subjective As soon as I read one of Yizheng Ge's novels, I immediately block it. It makes me sick to my stomach.

To be honest, there is no author who would not include private goods in his works. It's just about the reader's acceptance of the author's private goods. The author is a rare person for me who does not evaluate a historical figure subjectively but objectively. However, there are still some shortcomings. I am curious about how the author commented on Cao, Liu, and Sun in the Three Kingdoms, a review-heavy area. [Cool]

This book is relatively rare to be objective. Like other similar novels I have read, most of them are just blaming the princes and generals, and there is no practical information. If I want to comment on it, some fans will say "I have read the novels" and "read the history books". Having said that, the author should work hard and keep up the progress! [Learned]

It is a very good book. The evaluation is very objective. It is not like other novels that are mindlessly boastful and unscrupulous. I hope that historical figures in the future can also be objectively evaluated and not be like other novels that are full of praise and direct disparagement.

The level is much higher than that of female authors who don't understand history at all.

It's a very good book. It doesn't over-praise a person. The protagonist truly evaluates history from a materialist standpoint, rather than from a ruler's standpoint. This is really good.

Good article. I have read a lot of history books, most of which are internet history and full of shallow imagination. Come on, author

It's rare that I don't just praise Qin Shihuang. The bad ones didn't say the fairer point of view. It feels like the author is talking about dispelling rumors, but some of what he says are just rumors.

Everyone, please comment and evaluate, please give the author some motivation, thank you everyone.

This is good. There are no other novels that are written entirely subjectively, and the kind that deifies certain emperors is a different kind of darkness in a sense.

It's so good. I hope it won't be discontinued. Nowadays, the Qianlong of the Qing Dynasty has been belittled too much, and the achievements of the Ming Dynasty have been greatly exaggerated. I am not interested in the Ming and Qing Dynasties, but I am interested in the local development of the Ming Dynasty, the bridging of the north, water control, the Ping Jinchuan of the Qing Dynasty, and the great and small harvests of the Ming Dynasty. Governing Xinjiang, fixing the south of the Tianshan Mountains, driving Mongolia to the north, returning the land to the current, strengthening the governance of Tibet, Yunnan and Guizhou. I highly appreciate it. I hope to give great recognition to the achievements of Kangxi and Qianlong, and to give a fair evaluation to the Kangxi and Qianlong of the Qing Dynasty.

Great, so objective. I didn't expect to see Liu Bang exactly as I thought.

The author has detailed historical materials and quotes from classics, which shows that he has put a lot of effort into it. His evaluation of characters and events is not only supported by data, but also has his own objective opinions. It is a rare good book, and you can learn a lot of historical knowledge after reading it.

It is a very good historical article. It does not have a very strong subjective color like other historical articles. I did not see any incitement to ethnic hatred, which really surprised me. I hope the author can continue writing. I like this historical novel very much [Sending my heart]

I would like to see the author mention foreign history. For example, some people say that Chongzhen was born at an untimely time and compare it with Jun Shiyi. Or compare it to Ya-di during the Qin Dynasty. Although both kings were divided when they died, why Ya-di's reputation is much stronger than Ying Zheng can be discussed (if I remember correctly, the successors regarded themselves as the successors of Ya-di, and the Ptolemaic dynasty deified Ya-di himself)

It's really good and worth reading. It popularizes the real history without any nonsense or nonsense. It corrects my view of history. The most important thing is that as a novel, it is also very interesting!

In fact, I also wanted to write a novel about real history at that time, not just a story, but also a point out the various outrageous opinions on the Internet. Although everyone's opinions are different, I think that when it comes to history, you have to have your own opinion, and you have to provide real evidence, rather than just guessing and having strong subjective opinions. For example, for a certain master surnamed Yi, many times I want to go up and argue with him in person, but. Without this channel, when telling historical facts to those fans, and unable to fully express his thoughts due to word limit or time issues, the author is simply my Internet substitute. Although it is just a novel, it is more real than the Three Kingdoms and so on, and there is no so-called fraud.

The writing is very good and objective. The protagonist truly views every historical figure with historical materialism, without excessive praise or mindless belittling. Although there may still be some shortcomings, it is far better than other novels. Come on!

Hahaha I'm waiting for Yang Guang. Unfortunately, those Guangshen people probably won't watch it.

Not bad, does Wang Mang count as a time traveler from Zhou Dynasty to Han Dynasty (traveler)?

Highlights: Adhering to the materialist dialectical view of history. Disadvantages: It does not describe the changes in history after listening to history in ancient times, which feels relatively flat. Summary: Compared with those random writings, it is not interesting and joyful enough; compared with those serious historical readings, it is not profound enough. In addition, the author's writing power is slightly shallow, which makes it feel like drinking plain water. Worth cheering!

Tomato's most objective historical viewing body

So far, it's good. The author hasn't eaten the brainwashing kits from Emperor Qin and Hanwu that have been so many recently. If the author writes about the Ming Dynasty, I hope to do some research and eat less brainwashing kits from Jingnan and General Zhengbei.

Very good! Very correct! After reading this article, I can really understand the history and characters in an all-round way without being one-sided or biased. I have read many such articles before, but they are basically written and described based on the photos. This will really bias people like me who do not have a deep understanding of history. This article will correct these, so that people can introduce it more fairly and comprehensively, let people understand it, and change the judgment of right and wrong. He did not praise or belittle according to his own preferences. The merits and demerits were all laid out with good evidence. Especially the evaluation of the merits and demerits of the First Emperor was very clear and honest. Unlike other articles that were too overly exaggerated and praised. The First Emperor's personal ability and charm must have been there, but he also had his faults. If we were ordinary people, few of us would survive in the First Emperor's era... This article also writes in a very objective and realistic way why. Why do modern people praise the Qin Emperor and Han Dynasty like this? You can understand a lot if you take a closer look... The writing is also very good and not watery, not too messy. It is not like some articles that write a lot of things about the protagonist, and there are also some descriptions that make me feel embarrassed when I read it. But it is also because it is too serious and incisive, and it lacks some entertainment, but this depends on personal preference. I personally think that the writing is good and has depth. It is not an exaggeration.

That's great. Writing like this can show how outrageous those dynasty fans are. Come on, keep writing! I heard that Five Stars doesn't seem to remember the ratings. [Like][Like][Like][Like][Like]

A bit subversive, but reasonable and logical. It's rare to see someone who neither praises nor criticizes, but has an objective attitude.

It's a good talk, but this is Tomato, so the rating won't be high [face covering]

You have to give me a thumbs up, the author is very knowledgeable, and when he says he refutes rumors, he really refutes them [laughing and crying]