
Stats
5.8Score
Synopsis
No synopsis yet.
We haven’t got an English blurb for this one. It appears once the source description has been translated.

We haven’t got an English blurb for this one. It appears once the source description has been translated.
This is the e-sports article I have ever read. The setting of the plug-in is the most complicated and the description is the messiest. I explained the plug-in for most of the chapter. I was confused after reading it. During the game, I expressed my emotions in various ways, rambling about. Even the commentator said a sentence and wrote two paragraphs about what he felt after saying it. Then I talked about the resume of the commentator (tell me why this is necessary, they are competing).
The plug-in is written in a messy way and I can't understand it. In fact, it doesn't have to be so complicated and it can be simplified. The description of the opponent is a bit condescending. Who among them is a professional boy who is not a genius, so how can he make mistakes when meeting the protagonist. I like the author to describe more about those regrets. In the end, don't let the pig's feet become invincible at once. It's okay to lose or lose [Thoughts]
The evaluation is that the author is just a fun-loving person, and the plot is protracted by one person. He competes with dozens of pictures in one sentence, and then the description of the plug-in is a bit vague, and the description of why the protagonist can clearly see the fate of the opponent is vague. You can read the overall review but don't recommend it.
Goldfinger makes me crazy. It's a very bad game with 10 or so chapters and a lot of nonsense. It's not interesting at all. 3 Stars is recognition of your code.
The rhythm is wrong. When writing about the game, I write about personal actions, teammates' voices, and teammates' reactions. The reactions of the commentators and the reactions of the major anchors. Make it fun to intersperse it instead of writing all kinds of meaningless things
Is this link deliberately low on word count? It's so complicated.
Nondescript, what the hell, just for water word count
Although it is very laborious for you to write a novel, if it is not written well, it is not good.
Come on! I kinda like this kind of thing
What Goldfinger wrote makes me very confused. I can't understand what you are writing.
Grinding and grinding, a batch of water
Chapter 17: How to stun the buddy in Anne's first-level QQ?
Give it a thumbs up, it's rare for someone to write EDGUzi
Not very well written! He even wrote down everything his opponent was thinking! You have to write dozens of chapters for a BO3 today, right?
The gold finger setting is not good, it is too obscure.
Too bad. Words of mouth.
Fun person. . . . . .
It's quite problematic,
It's quite abstract, this characterization