This manuscript revolves around the theme of whether the dragon, a creature that is now mostly considered a legendary totem, really existed in nature. The author uses the legend of the "Dragon Shed" as an introduction, and combines it with a large number of ancient book records he has collected to analyze whether the dragon, as a creature, has the possibility of ever existing.
Later, based on the analysis of witness reports of dragon falling incidents in Northeast China many years ago, and combined with logical reasoning from various materials, the prototype of the creature "dragon" was examined, its history was traced, and the differences between dragons and snakes, crocodiles and crocodiles were distinguished and refuted with reasonable evidence.
Finally, it is inevitable to explain the metabolism of living things from a natural perspective. Various rare and exotic animals, including dragons, may have been seen by our ancestors. All of this may be far beyond our estimation.
The five appendices at the end of the article are lengthy but essential to this manuscript. It records the author's unremitting process of pursuing the truth of "dragon" from decades ago, and it is also a direct oral support for the inference of this article (including several interviews and identifications of direct or indirect witnesses of the dragon falling incident), which is very valuable.
Reader comments
I have been very interested in mysterious things since I was a child. However, as the author said, most of them, whether they are Eastern dragons or Western dragons, are covered with a layer of mystery and are linked to politics or beliefs, which makes me skeptical of their descriptions. However, after the author's explanation in this book, there has been a big change. If you look at it from a biological perspective and throw away the superstitious myths, it is indeed possible to exist. If you easily classify things you have not seen as non-existent, it is also a kind of paranoia and arrogant paranoia in a certain way. I hope to see more related books in the future.
Creatures on the earth are always mysterious. Human beings should not deny the records of their ancestors just because they have never seen them, such as sharks, dragons, phoenixes, unicorns and other animals. Maybe in this era of advanced information, some of us will see dragons and record them with more realistic photos and videos, or we may find so-called dragon relics to prove it.
I like the book's analysis of the dragon falling incident in Northeast China. It feels very mysterious. And the author is very powerful. He has spent decades pursuing the truth about "dragon". I admire this persistence very much. However, it is still a mystery whether dragons exist or not. I really hope more people will explore this interesting question.
Quoting from classics, it seems to make some sense anyway!
Very good, I have never seen this idea, and it is difficult to imagine in my mind how an amphibian can fly into the sky with the help of water, but it is not unreasonable. Unfortunately, most of the sources nowadays are promoted to be dragon stars in the sky, because it is the time of space exploration. The boss of the Chinese mythology forum is very straightforward. Those stars in the sky can even be traced to Cai Xukun. The source is the stars in the sky, which is just beautification.
Although it is a serious article, it is written smoothly and does not seem laborious.
This is the first time I have heard this statement, and I think the author's logic is basically clear and correct, and it is worth reading.
Still be skeptical about these things. Neither denying nor affirming.
Except for the scales and size, the salamander feels completely consistent. If there were dragons, the bifurcated horns might just be some kind of external gills. But no known salamanders have scales, let alone fly. According to the author, it can be seen in an average of fifteen years. Today, with the development of information, there are no pictures. If there is no news in a few decades, it is probably fake.
It has a scientific spirit of seeking truth from facts, rich in examples, and clear logic. It should be regarded as a natural history work rather than a literary work.
A serious, objective and rational investigation report embodies the author's scientific spirit.
Look at the problem more comprehensively and objectively.
Very good and rigorous.
Very good, very insightful
The information is very detailed and the evidence is true.
The author's various speculations about dragons can probably be justified. The point of view is novel and interesting, you can take a look.
I have been very interested in mysterious things since I was a child. However, as the author said, most of them, whether they are Eastern dragons or Western dragons, are covered with a layer of mystery and are linked to politics or beliefs, which makes me skeptical of their descriptions. However, after the author's explanation in this book, there has been a big change. If you look at it from a biological perspective and throw away the superstitious myths, it is indeed possible to exist. If you easily classify things you have not seen as non-existent, it is also a kind of paranoia and arrogant paranoia in a certain way. I hope to see more related books in the future.
Creatures on the earth are always mysterious. Human beings should not deny the records of their ancestors just because they have never seen them, such as sharks, dragons, phoenixes, unicorns and other animals. Maybe in this era of advanced information, some of us will see dragons and record them with more realistic photos and videos, or we may find so-called dragon relics to prove it.
I like the book's analysis of the dragon falling incident in Northeast China. It feels very mysterious. And the author is very powerful. He has spent decades pursuing the truth about "dragon". I admire this persistence very much. However, it is still a mystery whether dragons exist or not. I really hope more people will explore this interesting question.
Quoting from classics, it seems to make some sense anyway!
Very good, I have never seen this idea, and it is difficult to imagine in my mind how an amphibian can fly into the sky with the help of water, but it is not unreasonable. Unfortunately, most of the sources nowadays are promoted to be dragon stars in the sky, because it is the time of space exploration. The boss of the Chinese mythology forum is very straightforward. Those stars in the sky can even be traced to Cai Xukun. The source is the stars in the sky, which is just beautification.
Although it is a serious article, it is written smoothly and does not seem laborious. This is the first time I have heard this statement, and I think the author's logic is basically clear and correct, and it is worth reading.
Still be skeptical about these things. Neither denying nor affirming.
Except for the scales and size, the salamander feels completely consistent. If there were dragons, the bifurcated horns might just be some kind of external gills. But no known salamanders have scales, let alone fly. According to the author, it can be seen in an average of fifteen years. Today, with the development of information, there are no pictures. If there is no news in a few decades, it is probably fake.
It has a scientific spirit of seeking truth from facts, rich in examples, and clear logic. It should be regarded as a natural history work rather than a literary work.
A serious, objective and rational investigation report embodies the author's scientific spirit.
Look at the problem more comprehensively and objectively.
Very good and rigorous.
Very good, very insightful
The information is very detailed and the evidence is true.
The author's various speculations about dragons can probably be justified. The point of view is novel and interesting, you can take a look.