
Stats
5.8Score
Synopsis
No synopsis yet.
We haven’t got an English blurb for this one. It appears once the source description has been translated.

We haven’t got an English blurb for this one. It appears once the source description has been translated.
It's not bad. I've read more than ninety chapters so far. I'd like to make some suggestions for the author to refer to. One: The plot is relatively flat, and you can add some conflict and sensational stories appropriately. Two: If it is a purely refreshing article, you can ignore this article. If you strive to be true, you can refer to it. Is it appropriate to directly apply the author's financial knowledge to the time? Were there any private lending companies or related financial enterprises at that time? I personally understand that our current national policy investments are not primarily based on profit returns, such as national infrastructure investment and the layout of industrial supply chains. The former cannot recoup the investment, but its function of activating the economy and redistributing wealth is also the most important. The latter is the lifeline of the country's industry and must be controlled in one's own hands. This is all done at the expense of others. Therefore, our financial capital must not be like Western capitalism.
It's so good. The author writes well and has a certain understanding of industrial production.
Write quickly, I love reading it
It is not easy to write about ordinary work after the founding of the People's Republic of China. Everyone's writing is vivid and flesh-and-blood. . The level is very high and very different! [Like][Like][Like][OK]
Well written, don't be a eunuch
Overall, it's okay. It's just that the writing is a little flat, without ups and downs. There are improvements, but it's not enough.