[Alternate history + no system + through books + tactics]
The emperor died without any reason, and the prince who had been exiled for three years returned to the capital without an edict. Was all this accidental or intentional?
Zhao Ruyi, whose parents and brothers died at the beginning, perfectly inherited the high-quality buffs of all emperors in Chinese history, established a cabinet, and created the Imperial Guard...
I thought that all this was official history, and that his highest achievement would only unify the land of China. But when a mysterious woman named Li Qinglian arrived in Chapter 39, everything was turned upside down in an instant.
Opening a bank in ancient times? Engage in real estate? Early access to capitalization?
Reader comments
In fact, it's quite good. The story is relatively new, but you hit a big poisonous point in just a few chapters. The protagonist is the emperor of a country. For some inexplicable little thing, he secretly ran to the border by himself, alone. The protagonist is the emperor, and he is not a gangster. Is there any mistake? Doesn't the author know that this is the biggest poisonous point in historical emperor stories? The positioning of the protagonist is that the emperor is not a charlatan. An emperor runs to do the things of a charlatan [fear][fear][fear] The emperor should be written from the emperor's perspective. You have such a big poisonous point in the early stage, no matter how good you write later, this poisonous point alone will dissuade many readers, and the author can't write emotional drama, so he should try not to write it. It's really embarrassing. Here I wish the author better and better results.
The author himself gives his book five stars. There is nothing wrong with it [laughing and crying] [laughing and crying]
In fact, it's quite good. The story is relatively new, but you hit a big poisonous point in just a few chapters. The protagonist is the emperor of a country. For some inexplicable little thing, he secretly ran to the border by himself, alone. The protagonist is the emperor, and he is not a gangster. Is there any mistake? Doesn't the author know that this is the biggest poisonous point in historical emperor stories? The positioning of the protagonist is that the emperor is not a charlatan. An emperor runs to do the things of a charlatan [fear][fear][fear] The emperor should be written from the emperor's perspective. You have such a big poisonous point in the early stage, no matter how good you write later, this poisonous point alone will dissuade many readers, and the author can't write emotional drama, so he should try not to write it. It's really embarrassing. Here I wish the author better and better results.
The author himself gives his book five stars. There is nothing wrong with it [laughing and crying] [laughing and crying]