I Took the Chicken Dinner System to the Three Kingdoms

Let me talk about a few questions. ①The protagonist develops in this place, so it's his servant, his so-called fiancée's family, and I haven't heard that the protagonist wants to drive that family out. After all, the protagonist and his follower. Just moved the fat man's body out of the door. Just met so many people. Keep those people in check. That is to say. The protagonist lives not far from his fiancée's family. The relationship has already become tense. Either the protagonist leaves. If the protagonist doesn't leave, then that family will leave. But I didn't see which side was going. ②It means that the system has no loyalty. I just don't know if others are loyal or not. Because the protagonist uses a gun. I believe that I will also equip my subordinates with guns in the future. If you prepare for some men with double-minded intentions, turn around and shoot the protagonist from behind. Doesn't the protagonist die unjustly? ③I just saw white noodles being used. Motivate those people to run and exercise. But seeing the protagonist arrange those things. I don't know what to think. I just feel like it's poorly written. I can't tell you exactly what's wrong.

Although a lot of the writing is unreasonable, I think it's pretty good. Two words (comfortable). Author, you don't write around beauty, but around the people, governing the people to live a good life. Unlike the protagonists in other books, who have cheats and just want to stop the beauty and not do practical things. , Collect talents to gain strength to fight against the princes, briefly describe how the people live, and do practical things when traveling to the past for enjoyment. If you don't do practical things, what is the use of traveling to the past? It is a mistake to spend power to allow you to travel. This book is a systematic text, and everything that is unreasonable should be found in the system.

The subject matter is good, and the background is good, but it's a pity that this uneducated kindergarten kid wrote in such a mess, with too many blocking points, it's like the smelly and long footcloth of an old lady! If I can give one star, I will give it directly, but it does not count as points.

To persuade you to quit, how many computer accounts did the author open to get good reviews? There are tens of thousands of typos in 10 chapters, but you are still said to be well written? Obviously the author painted it himself

It's a novice article, it's a brainless and cool article, so only newcomers can accept the toxicity.

The writing is too idealistic. It's okay to dream, but reality is really difficult.

The writing is good, but I feel that the force is not matched. More than one million people are fighting with cold weapons and hundreds of thousands of hot weapons. It can still scare those with hot weapons, and an additional 400,000 troops are needed.

This is the author's dream, in reality he won't survive two episodes!

Damn it, a regiment commander with a military commander under his command?

Just read two chapters! The real special code is so eye-catching, there are so many typos, but this slogan: Follow me and win glory for the country, slip away.