
Stats
9.5Score
29Chapters
Tags
Synopsis
Reader comments
In booklists 2
The Protagonist Designed the Crime, No One Survived, Manslaughter
There is a novel in which the protagonist travels to a time to reduce the crime rate, so he organizes a live broadcast of solving crimes. The protagonist wrote the script of Manslaughter, Mekong River Case, No Survivor, and participated in it. After the completion, there will be an explanation from the police station. What novel is it? I forgot.
14.8MViews223Books15dUpdated
I Want to See the Sincerity of Rotten People
I didn't read it before, but now I feel like it's really interesting. Is there any similar book?
1.8MViews201Books2dUpdated










The young girl only has love and hate in her eyes, the kind-hearted wife considers everyone, and the selfish husband vows to paint the best painting of his life. In the end, everyone is injured. A complete work is created from different angles, and the murderer is among them.
I guessed who the murderer was from the beginning. When she said she overheard the conversation between Amyas and Caroline, I felt that she must have concealed some key content and only told information that was harmful to Caroline. After all, with her character, the article also mentioned that she wants to get whatever she wants, and the person she likes may be no exception. They always use youth and true love as an excuse. Really beautiful things are not mixed with any disgusting and ugly things. They are simply beautiful. That's why beautiful things make people feel so precious. A person has no bottom line and only wants what he wants. To put it nicely, it means being honest, but to take what you want. To say it badly, it means plundering. And Amyas, a man who regards art as everything, really brings together all the ugly sides of some men. He doesn't respect women or emotions. He uses art as a shield. If his character is not good, it is his character. Artists are more emotional, but you are a human being. You can't control what you should and shouldn't do? No matter how talented he is, the article mentions many times that he has relationships with many women, but will return to Caroline in the end. It also implies that the ending should be no exception for Elsa, a young girl this time, who is not even a woman. This man is so selfish. Self-interest, like a natural emotional flaw, when I was reading the article, I thought that if Elsa knew that she had the same fate as his previous women, she would definitely be the one to kill her because of her indifference and self-indulgence. And don't forget, who stayed with Amyas the longest before he died. Except for Angela, most of the others said they loved Caroline, but did they really love her? When you think that a person is the murderer, any clues will be connected by being close to that target...
The reversal is wonderful. After the truth is revealed, Poirot says that Elsa only knows love and hate, and Elsa also says that she is dead. The last scene is so well written, Elsa passes by two young people who are about to start a life together, two living people who love each other.
It's nice to piece together the truth from the different narratives of five people with different personalities. Feeling sad for Caroline, a life shrouded in guilt.
My intuition is very accurate. I don't feel happy every time I guess the right answer. On the contrary, I feel very uncomfortable when I guess wrong. This makes me more aware of how difficult it is to be happy. I also hate the cleverness of this kind of person. First, the mistress is disrespectful and dismissive of his wife. Then, he loves his wife but has a hateful face. He is jealous of other people's feelings and feels that he has been tricked. I am not saying that it is a sin for girls to chase married men. I am saying that according to my moral code, men with wives should stay away from (painter) (interesting to me). Are everyone in the world like this? Art comes from life. Of course, she was already doing immoral things, so how could she become someone who would not consider the motive of murder? Are the people at the scene blind? I have to constantly push myself not to become such a numb person. Isn't there a delicate, sensitive and suspicious person among these five people? If I meet someone who is wronged, will I think clearly about the doubts and then come forward? That woman has a twisted heart, maybe it's "popular" not to blame girls now. I also want to find extreme fairness. It would be great if the man didn't get involved with women. It would be great if the woman knew that someone else had a wife and wouldn't pester others. It would be great if the explanation between husband and wife could prevent the walls from having ears. Only a kind wife still felt sorry for the young girl when she learned that her husband was going to abandon the young girl. And the culprit did not feel that the scapegoat had anything to be pitiful about. In this way It is true that the ignorant woman is even more immoral. She kills her when she doesn't get it, and puts the blame on others. She is insidious and vicious. I hope that kind people will never encounter such monsters and ghosts in their lives. Kind people will be happy in their lives.
"Because, my child, you have much to learn." "Is there anything I must learn?" "All the adult emotions - pity, sympathy, understanding. All you've ever known is - love and hate."
I read each person's narrative several times. There are many narratives, including those of the police and lawyers, and those of the parties involved. However, the narratives that can actually be connected into a complete reasoning process are only those things that are hidden by the surface, that is, the "truth." It is a very perfect mystery novel. Many details are described in the book. Just see if you can find it out. Although the numerous narratives are a bit boring to read, as a mystery novel itself, it can be said to be almost impeccable! As an aside, the really pitiable person is "Caroline". She is a good woman in the true sense. Not only does she have to go to jail for a crime she did not commit, but she is also criticized by many people. I can only say that the real murderer is so disgusting!
I didn't guess the ending. It is worthy of the work of the Queen of Mysteries. As one comment said, I too was burned by the brilliance of humanity. The murderer is a child, a stubborn and cruel child who does not understand how precious understanding and compassion are.
Excellent work, worth watching, it triggered my thinking about emotions. Both love and hate can push people into the abyss.
Everyone has a motive for murder, each character is described very vividly, and each person's heart is clearly portrayed, making the reader immersed in it. Lies and truth allow readers to distinguish and use logical thinking to deduce who is the murderer.
The reasoning is well-founded, the plot is interesting, and the logic is reasonable. It is an underrated work by Grandma.
Two naive people are attracted to each other. She loves his uniqueness, and he loves her youth. However, she did not expect that he is ruthless. On the contrary, the first wife she targets is kind and empathetic. She sees her first wife from the perspective of an enemy, but the first wife sees her from the perspective of a woman. The man who is eventually backlashed by the young and energetic man is not pitiful. The most innocent person in the whole book is probably the first wife.
It was only at the end that I guessed the murderer, and at first I suspected Angela. Of course, in a poisoning case, it is important to understand who poisoned the person, where the poison was placed, and who can get it. This is discussed at the beginning. The events described later are mainly about motives, and when I saw Mr. Krell's words, "Everything tastes so bad today," I felt it was particularly inconsistent, and I suspected the third party.
Not an older sister, not a younger sister, not a teacher, not two brothers, but actually a mistress. She sat in front of the painter and watched the painter die. Love gave birth to hatred, which was terrible. Strong emotions allow people to redeem each other. The elder sister is guilty and the younger sister is innocent, but the real murderer is allowed to go free. It is so unfair. That man really deserves to die.
I read the physical book in the bookstore. Through questioning the five people and their letters, I was able to deduce many details. However, I still guessed the wrong murderer. The final ending will not make people feel inexplicable, as it is corroborated by details.
The murderer is really unexpected, but after reading it, it makes sense in retrospect. I was misled by the motive in the early stage. Every one of Grandma's books is still so exciting.
She walked towards the door, muttering, "I am the one who died..."
It's so sad. The real pain is not hatred, but neglect and indifference. There is no winner.
I read it when I was in high school, and I admired the author's subtle reasoning ability. Every sentence, word, and look are all clues.
A typical man, a typical wife, a typical mistress
Caroline is my grief [crying]
At first I thought it was the teacher, because she is always ignored by others, and the murderer is often the one who is easily ignored. Then I thought it was Philip, and only at the end did I know who it was. I still don't have enough brain cells [laughing and crying]
The characters all have distinct characteristics. Although the ending of this book was a bit beyond my expectations, the final reasoning process also made me feel like I had a sudden realization (my guess was more based on the possibility of emotional thinking).
Love; atonement; the pursuit of inner peace; only those with good nature can have it.
It's a blast to watch, and impeccable murder is art. Grandma is really capable [like][like]
I read forty of Agatha's books when I was in college, and I still have forty that I haven't read yet. As I enter middle age, I plan to finish them all.
Quite a sad story
Before reading, there is no truth.
It should be said that Agatha's name is a guarantee of quality!
It was so well written that I thought I was taking the blame for my sister. Unexpectedly