Tragedy in Three Acts

This book is so wonderful! Agatha Christie's narrative style is always so engaging and keeps me completely immersed in the story. I especially like Detective Poirot, his intelligence and keen insight are amazing. The annoying character in the book is the innocent girl who doesn't know what the world is like. Her ignorance and impulsiveness have brought a lot of trouble to the case investigation. However, this also makes the story more twists and turns and interesting. Overall, "A Tragedy in Three Acts" is a great book worth reading and I highly recommend it!

The 10th installment of Detective Poirot. A dinner party was held at Crow's Nest Villa. There were 14 people dining. Villa owner, actress, housekeeper, theater spectator, doctor, pastor, pastor's wife, captain, captain's wife, female writer, actress, illegitimate rich young master, lovely girl Dandan, Dandan's mother, Poirot. The curtain of the play opens. In the first scene, the priest is poisoned. In the second act, the doctor is poisoned. In the third act, a female patient in a sanatorium was poisoned. What is the murderer's motive for killing? Still a great story! [Shy][shy][shy][shy]

Spoilers spoilers spoilers There are spoilers not only for this book, but also for "Mysterious Case in the Clouds" The first time I saw it, I guessed about a third of the murderer and a little bit about the method. Seeing other servants' descriptions of the butler as "different from other butlers", a thought flashed through my mind, "Could someone be playing this butler?" Then I thought of the doctor's uncharacteristic teasing and joking, and I became even more certain that it was Charles, an old actor, who played the role. In addition, there is a small shortcut that can further confirm the identity of the murderer, that is, Grandma has to match up a couple in every novel, just like the matchmaking between Jane and the little archaeologist in "The Strange Case in the Clouds" confirmed that the dentist Jane originally liked was the murderer. In this book, Dandan is attracted to a dead old man. Is this in line with Grandma's habit? Obviously not. What would cause this deeply in love old and young couple to separate? Obviously, it was to make the dead old man the murderer. Also, Grandma is not like Ayatsuji Yukito, who likes to deliberately reduce the role of the murderer and weaken the presence of the murderer. Grandma's murderer has always had a high presence. When I read this book, it always gave me a feeling like "Roger Mystery". Then when it comes to the technique, the secret change of cups is really simple, direct and completely unexpected. It is simply bold and fits well with Charles's character. When the surname Mug Cup came out, I immediately put on the smiling face emoticon. And the conversation between Poirot and Satterthwaite at the end really made you two laugh to death.

She directed and acted in it, but I guessed wrong again. I thought she was a playwright. She has a kind of humorous cruelty. At that time, divorce was not possible at will, which led to many unhappy marriages, but random killings were also terrifying. For true love, you can kill other people, but one day, you will also hurt your lover, because the extreme way of loving makes people feel suffocated. For love and money, sometimes, just for yourself, everything is just a cover-up.

Second swipe to punch in. (Yes, after many years, I am currently keen on playing the Polo series for the second time. It's like this, it's been too long - I was in a different mood when I read it twice, and for different reasons, I've almost forgotten most of the plot, but when I finally decrypted it, I still felt creepy. I vaguely remember that this book didn't arouse much interest in me when I first read it. Maybe it was because the starting point was too high - "Roger's Mystery". However, I have been reading the yellow series this year, and the quality is mixed. When I returned to read the blue series again, my experience was different. Finally, I want to say that some people complain that there is too much foreshadowing, but this is a long novel, and a long novel should have the appearance of a long novel. The characters, scenes, and details should be comprehensive. If you just want to pursue the thrill of murder and solving crimes, I suggest you read short films by other famous authors.

Not bad, I think I had a hard time watching it, mainly because I couldn't understand the connection between the cases at all. I wanted to think about the murderer later, so I chose the relevant characters based on the title of the book. I didn't expect it. The story development is okay, but don't fall in love with a man who is 30 years older than you. It will be later, who understands my shock when I see that 30-year-old man. If the balls are 18, that one is 48, and if the balls are 21, that one is 51. I really [face covering]

I guessed the murderer [laughs][laughs]

Booming, booming, booming, booming, booming

This is a book I'm afraid of being spoiled.

I can't stop watching it

Very interesting book

At first I thought it was some uninvited guest, then I thought it was Dandan, and then it was gone [laughing and crying]

I'm in the smoke bomb released by grandma again. In fact, grandma left a lot of clues, but I ignored them. I have to continue to follow grandma's ideas. I like grandma's logical structure👍

I really didn't expect that based on past routines, I thought the motive was to make money.

Random killings are used as rehearsals, what a scary motive! Poirot escapes death again!

It's so exciting, I wouldn't have thought it would be like this until I saw it at the end! As expected of grandma!