Dr. Calgary made a sudden visit to the Argyle family living in Sunny Point in the evening, bringing news: The youngest son Jack, who was suspected of murdering his mother and was convicted and eventually died tragically in prison, was wrongly convicted.
The Doctor himself can corroborate his alibi.
However, this delayed justice left the family confused and even frightened.
Dr. Calgary was puzzled. He felt that there were some secrets hidden in this family.
Can the real culprit in old cases still be found today? And is finding the real culprit really the best way to solve this matter...
Reader comments
It's really beautiful! In fact, at the beginning, the widow came to the old nanny and kept saying, "It's impossible, it's impossible, this can't be true." In addition, the widow said that he had a record of defrauding middle-aged and elderly women, so I thought it was probably the old nanny, because what should I say? The motivations of the husband and secretary were too obvious, so I directly excluded hhhh. As for the others, I originally thought it would be Mary because she was too resistant, so I chose 1 out of 2 of them, and it turned out to be the nanny... There was another work before, which seemed to be a tragedy in three acts, right? It probably means that men of this age will be desperate if they fall in love. Now it seems that women of this age will be desperate if they fall in love.
In addition to Tina, Mrs. Rachel raised a group of white-eyed wolves. They just resented her, enjoying all this while hating their benefactor.
Each of them had arms and legs and could leave and make a scene. But they didn't leave, enjoying everything as a matter of course, and felt that Rachel just treated them as pets, but they had no consciousness of being pets.
Food doesn't go into their mouths by itself, and they are not tied up. If I were Rachel and I really treated them as pets, I should put them on a chain and give them some food if they were happy, and a few whips if they were unhappy. After all, they are really chilling.
Rachel was controlling because she was unable to have children and lacked a sense of security, and they never thought of taking serious care of their mother because she was too kind, which encouraged their selfishness, shamelessness, enjoying the house, food, and wanting more things.
As Rachel told them to go to bed early and eat bread (really like Versailles), she said she bought them to keep them away from their parents. They really talk like children, who never grow up and always shirk their responsibilities.
I was thinking about my parents, but with such an obvious problem, they had experienced abandonment at a precocious age. Wouldn't you think that their parents would not abandon them as long as they cared about them?
If it weren't for the Doctor, they would always live selfishly. They each have their own agendas and each say innocent things. Are they really innocent? After everyone died, I remembered that I regretted it, that my mother's words were right, and that I was so shameless.
Innocent people will hope that the truth will be revealed, but those with evil intentions will be afraid of ghosts knocking on the door.
The plot of this book is so exciting! Agatha Christie is really a talented writer, and her works are always full of suspense and surprises. I particularly enjoyed the book's depiction of family secrets that kept me guessing until the very end. Moreover, I felt that her portrayal of humanity was very profound and gave me my own perspective on each character. This "Murder on Order" is definitely a good book worth reading!
Grandma is really good at planning. I thought I would guess it right if I followed the clues, but it turned out not to be the case [face covering]
She deserves to be called the queen of detective novels. I can't stop reading it.
It's really beautiful! In fact, at the beginning, the widow came to the old nanny and kept saying, "It's impossible, it's impossible, this can't be true." In addition, the widow said that he had a record of defrauding middle-aged and elderly women, so I thought it was probably the old nanny, because what should I say? The motivations of the husband and secretary were too obvious, so I directly excluded hhhh. As for the others, I originally thought it would be Mary because she was too resistant, so I chose 1 out of 2 of them, and it turned out to be the nanny... There was another work before, which seemed to be a tragedy in three acts, right? It probably means that men of this age will be desperate if they fall in love. Now it seems that women of this age will be desperate if they fall in love.
In addition to Tina, Mrs. Rachel raised a group of white-eyed wolves. They just resented her, enjoying all this while hating their benefactor. Each of them had arms and legs and could leave and make a scene. But they didn't leave, enjoying everything as a matter of course, and felt that Rachel just treated them as pets, but they had no consciousness of being pets. Food doesn't go into their mouths by itself, and they are not tied up. If I were Rachel and I really treated them as pets, I should put them on a chain and give them some food if they were happy, and a few whips if they were unhappy. After all, they are really chilling. Rachel was controlling because she was unable to have children and lacked a sense of security, and they never thought of taking serious care of their mother because she was too kind, which encouraged their selfishness, shamelessness, enjoying the house, food, and wanting more things. As Rachel told them to go to bed early and eat bread (really like Versailles), she said she bought them to keep them away from their parents. They really talk like children, who never grow up and always shirk their responsibilities. I was thinking about my parents, but with such an obvious problem, they had experienced abandonment at a precocious age. Wouldn't you think that their parents would not abandon them as long as they cared about them? If it weren't for the Doctor, they would always live selfishly. They each have their own agendas and each say innocent things. Are they really innocent? After everyone died, I remembered that I regretted it, that my mother's words were right, and that I was so shameless. Innocent people will hope that the truth will be revealed, but those with evil intentions will be afraid of ghosts knocking on the door.
The plot of this book is so exciting! Agatha Christie is really a talented writer, and her works are always full of suspense and surprises. I particularly enjoyed the book's depiction of family secrets that kept me guessing until the very end. Moreover, I felt that her portrayal of humanity was very profound and gave me my own perspective on each character. This "Murder on Order" is definitely a good book worth reading!
Grandma is really good at planning. I thought I would guess it right if I followed the clues, but it turned out not to be the case [face covering]
She deserves to be called the queen of detective novels. I can't stop reading it.