ABC Murders

Complete in one breath and hearty, Agatha's works are always so enjoyable. The only regret is that this book is so old that I guessed the murderer halfway through reading similar stories and lost the sense of surprise at the end.

Oh My God! ! ! No wonder this one is so famous! ! ! ! Hercule Poirot is a god! ! ! ! ! Agatha Christie is a god! ! ! ! ! ! ! The style always starts from the relationship between people, and the case arrangement and logic are very strong. A lot of pen and ink was also spent on describing the characters, especially the relationships and language descriptions of each character, which clearly revealed the characteristics of each character. In particular, this book starts from "personality", and Poirot also traces back from "personality". In the end, it was because of the personality discrepancy that he finally identified the murderer. From the first letter, I felt that he should be a lunatic with a dark personality. Such an image is very common in contemporary times, but it might not have been the case back then, and the whole text also emphasized the lunatic, so I firmly believed that I was on the right track. So until we finally found Custer, Poirot said that he knew nothing about the murderer. I was also confused. Did you mean that Custer hadn't told everything properly? Result This reversal, I'm really, damn, incoherent, just, really, Absolutely amazing! ! ! ! ! Including every case in the middle, I was confused even when there were no clues. I kept concentrating on finding the "ABC". I never suspected anyone else, and I never thought that the third case was the real murder. For the real "ABC", A and B were just appetizers, and D was just a cover-up. I really didn't notice it at all, and was completely led by the murderer. It wasn't until Poirot's ambiguous attitude towards Custer being the murderer that I became suspicious. This series of cases turned out to be just an accessory to a murder. It's the kind of mystery novel where a murderer lures investigators into his own conspiracy. And this case is simply amazing! I really, really like Agatha Christie's books, each one brings me endless surprises!

Damn it, this is the first time I realized how awesome Grandma's book is! After watching No Survival before, I personally felt that the plot was rough and needed to be polished; then there was the Roger Mystery Case, which was originally a great narrative, but because I was exposed, it felt... Average. When I read this abc this time, I discovered the meticulousness of Grandma's logic. And the atmosphere is really good. Although I don't care much about European and American works, the atmosphere created by Grandma was really good. Watching No Life at first was like watching a movie, and this one is the same. Much better than many mystery writers. Let's talk about the plot, the foreshadowing and the ending are all perfect. Detailed explanations are given for the doubts and inconspicuous points that were laid before, as well as the ending. The most important thing is that the murderer on the surface is too confusing. I thought Custer's perspective was the murderer's perspective, and I tried to analyze his psychological state, thinking that this writing method was quite novel; but it turned out that Grandma was superior, and this was the psychological state of the victim. The identity setting is also very clever. Veteran, headache, slow, inconspicuous, it is indeed a careful setting. In conclusion, a very perfect book.

Agatha Completion Plan (Poirot Series) Detective Poirot 4-1 Season 4 is all about long stories, so the episodes are also one movie long. It's easy to think of Jack the Ripper when you see the preview letter. However, Jack only started writing letters in the middle and late stages, so it's not ruled out that someone else is impersonating him. The ABC murderer took advantage of this to confuse the public. A sane madman challenged the great detective Poirot in order to become famous. It was clear that no one would be able to find out if he didn't write a letter, and he would even think of other people as the murderer, but he chose to reveal that he did it all himself. Poirot was unable to obtain more effective clues from the letter to prevent the murder. The families of the victims in the three ABC cases decided to join forces to find out the real murderer. However, Poirot always felt that something was wrong. Thanks to Hastings, his too simple mind would help Poirot eliminate unnecessary interference. Why does the murderer commit crimes continuously, and why does the murderer make mistakes in a certain case? Once the correct suspect is identified, everything will be easily solved. P. S. The commentary has been completed. Some details of the drama are different from the novel, but overall it is very restored. There are a lot of characters in this story. You can click on the paragraph to comment on the characters in the play. I like the ending very much, Poirot saves an innocent and almost lost soul.

It is the most "original" mystery novel among all Grandma's novels, or the most typical and purest "classical mystery novel" among all Grandma's novels. The reason why I didn't give it full marks for logical reversals and tricks is because I think there are more classic works in Grandma's novels, and in the genre of "classical mystery novels", they are still not as good as works like "The Tragedy of X"

The final result is indeed a bit unexpected. The logic of the whole story is really well written and very attractive for people to read. The final endings of Agatha's books are quite attractive.

I thought he was a younger brother or a secretary, but I never thought it was the same person. Although the story seems to have always led everyone to be the same mad killer, the fact that my brother was used to walking alone at that time is a detail that only family members know... For me, the answer is neither a surprise nor a reversal. It makes sense, but this honest man is too pitiful, right? I feel sad for him and worry about myself. Isn't my character too soft? I'm always a scapegoat in life, so I have to think about it all the time and push myself to read more books and interact less with others to avoid getting hurt.

Whoever profits from this case may be the murderer. In the process of investigating the case, I have been thinking about why the murderer committed the crime for no reason. Is it just because he wanted to be famous? Then couldn't he achieve the effect by committing the crime in public? Seeing that the victim was killed on a familiar walking path, I suspected that an acquaintance committed the crime. Clark once again revealed his knowledge of his brother's whereabouts. At the same time, his personality was a bit contrasting. The middle-aged man was childish (selfish, impulsive, fearless, and looking for excitement). He also lived with his brother and liked the women around him. Alas, the suspicion is too great. But I thought he was the manipulator, and the poor man who was mentally ill (easily induced) was the murderer. So the ending was a bit unexpected. I still underestimated his impulsiveness and fearlessness and thought he was killing someone with a borrowed knife.

The famous novel "Hidden Trees in the Forest" is a mystery novel that is classic, delicate, and fast. As expected, the Queen of Mysteries is

The reversal is really awesome, reminds me of Frog Man (there are a lot of similarities). In the first part of Frog Man, Sayuri takes advantage of Katsuo, and Sayuri is taken advantage of by the old professor; in the second part, the professor conceals the truth and confuses accidents with accidents. (Sorry for the spoilers)

There's not much to say, Agatha really deserves the title of Queen of Mystery🥰🥰

I read it a second time (the first time was on an e-book), and I had different feelings both times, but the same admiration for the case! Grandma deliberately arranged a special character to "confuse the audience", and the two-line parallel narrative method is very interesting. The interaction between Poirot and Hastings is also very cute.

Oh my god, the ending of this book is truly magical! It must be said that 98% of the content in the previous article creates a cool impression of a serial perverted murder case. When it comes to the chapter where Poirot interrogates the criminals, I feel that he is also a little superior. (Maybe Lao Ka is a person who feels pitiful after talking for a few chapters.) It is a bit depressing after reading, but in the end! Grandma is grandma! Just break everything and give a good ending, warm and comedic. Good.

Very good!👍 The endings of Agatha's books are often unexpected.

I was dizzy when I saw it. Since the last time the murderer over there was a police detective from our perspective, and he committed the crime under my nose, and I hadn't guessed it yet, this case also surprised me in terms of its unexpectedness. I had already seen that there was another murderer, but I really didn't expect it to be him. He is the first person in this book besides Poirot and Hastings that I labeled as a "good guy". I was tricked around by grandma again. I could still keep up with the pace of detail attention and reasoning at the beginning, but when the truth was revealed later I was completely confused. When the pieces of evidence that I had ignored in the gaps were presented to me one after another, I could no longer react except to widen my eyes and look confused. So amazing! How on earth can we plan such a complicated case? How are these seemingly unrelated clues connected together? It's hard to imagine how much effort it took, and it's hard to imagine whether this is a human brain.

Spoiler alert Spoiler alert Spoiler alert [Spoiler alert! ! ! Don't click] When I originally watched the middle part of "ABC Murder", I found that there was a non-Hastings perspective, and from this perspective, "I" is simply the murderer: the identity of the stocking seller, the basic ability to use a typewriter, the panic in the face of some things, paying special attention to the case, and appearing nearby when the case occurred... It is simply the murderer's perspective. So I was still thinking that the narrative method this time was quite interesting. The murderer was exposed directly, and the murderer did not look like a high-IQ criminal. How to write this book interestingly, especially the last case d, where "I" returned to the hotel after everyone screamed, with blood on his sleeves and a state of panic. It was really a clever writing technique. I really believed that this was the murderer's perspective. The result was a big reversal! "I" was arrested, and he admitted to killing someone, but Polo integrated every piece of the puzzle and deduced the facts and the real murderer. "Hidden in the forest." I was also deceived by the real murderer. I only thought about serial murders and ABC magazine. Therefore, I was a madman. I couldn't think about him with normal people's thinking. I even suspected that he used the method of killing others to "save" out of extreme religious beliefs. It turned out not to be. We have all been deceived by the murderer. As expected of Agatha!

The classic degree of abc is that it created a brand new model, so that whenever I watch a mystery work, I often think, is it the type of abc murder?

It is indeed one of Agatha's classic works! To hide the true motive of a case is to insert it into a series of murders. The murderer was really bold and childish, even a little arrogant. This time I was really happy that I guessed the real murderer during the reading process, but after learning about his various motives for killing in the end, I felt even more that the murderer was cold-blooded and ruthless. Fortunately, Poirot found the real murderer in the end, and Mr. Custer, who took the blame, was also saved. See you in the next book!

When I first started reading, I thought it was pretty good. When I was almost halfway through, I already felt like I had discovered the truth. Because I was standing in God's perspective, my mood was average when I read the last part. But fortunately, I didn't skip reading. I was really, really lucky. It was only at the end that I was really shocked. The twist was really amazing, but it was reasonable. I can only say that I am worthy of Agatha Christie. I can only say that I am really a little arrogant. I highly recommend this book. You must read it when you have time.

Like Christie [love]

Unexpected and reasonable

Polo is really a smart, capable and kind old man

"When do you least pay attention to a needle? When it's stuck in a pincushion!" Poirot's gray matter cells come into play again [exploration]! It's wonderful, isn't it?

The gray threads of grass and snakes hide trees in the forest, wonderful

Pineapple Pineapple is such a cute little old man! ! ! U ´ᴥ` U The bickering with Hastings was so fun! The case is also very exciting. The pace is tight, the characters are rich, and they are cleverly connected from the inconspicuous details. Agatha, you are my goddess! V✪ω✪V

It's really good, isn't it [laughs]

A classic indeed! ! !

It was so exciting that I had no idea who the murderer was until the end.

I was a little disappointed when Custer first appeared. I always felt that the murderer should not be an unrelated person. As expected, mystery novels are still inseparable from reversals! Feel comfortable!

Hhh, the murderer underestimated Poirot, and Poirot overestimated the murderer. Later, Poirot came to his senses and conducted rigorous reasoning on the case. The reversal of the story was amazing.