This Textbook Can't Be Right, I Didn't Die Back Then!

The plot is very good, but the author's writing skills are too bad or the author's method of writing the book is not right. I always hear that the author is confused and does not explain it clearly. I hope the author can explain it more clearly. If the author is not very good at writing narration, he can write more dialogues and write all the conditions into the dialogues. This way, it feels like the writing can be better. The author is really not good at long dialogues. I think the author can only write dialogues alone. Otherwise, those redundant narrations really look like ~ Oh, those things that surprise, feel, and so on really feel like a lot of fish. If these are removed alone and only the dialogues are read, this book is not bad, really. There are really a lot of fish that can be removed from those "what's surprising" ones.

I have no reason to give it a good rating, but it can't be too bad either

Why are there many typos or missing characters? I looked at it sharply, and then I read it two or three times before I realized that it was a homonym. But in fact it's not this word, it's a typo.

Very good, author, come on