Sima Yi, the Master Strategist

This book is very interesting. I personally don't like or hate Sima Yi, but I think Sima Yi has no intention of rebellion, but what he needs is supreme power and the elimination of dissidents. Because he could see clearly that in troubled times, one cannot help oneself. But the way he excludes dissidents does make people think he is ruthless and wants to usurp the throne. To be honest, this kind of person is not suitable for being a colleague or friend. It is hard to say whether he will seduce you in the face of interests. But his ability is indeed worthy of recognition. In almost all Three Kingdoms games, Zhuge Liang's intelligence is 100 and Sima Yi is 99. I think this is an insult to Sima Yi.

From this book, I realized that Sima Yi judged the situation and could tolerate the unfavorable situation or implement tough measures against his own unfavorable forces. He was worthy of being an old man, but there was also some luck involved in his success.

The writing is humorous, not as boring as official history, nor as catchy as unofficial history. While citing scriptures, we also make reasonable assumptions about the gaps in historical records. The full text is easy to understand and is friendly to history buffs!

The plot of this book is so exciting! The author tells the story of Sima Yi very vividly. I especially like the plot of Sima Yi pretending to be sick and waiting for the opportunity. His patience and wisdom are really admirable. Moreover, the characters in the book are very vivid, such as Zhuge Liang and Jiang Wei, and their rivalry is very exciting. I think this book is not only telling history, but also telling us to learn to wait and seize opportunities.

Sima Yi can endure and have a strategy, a military prodigy, not afraid of a decisive battle with you but afraid that you will run away, and can attack the heart. Cao Shuang is too incompetent at important moments. Huan Fan chose to follow Cao Shuang since he did not understand Cao Shuang's ability. It is a pity that you can't look back if you follow the wrong person. Sima Yi's understanding of human nature and game play are fully demonstrated.

2025.2.4.12.00 Sima Yi may be a stereotype brought about by film and television works. Personally, I feel that the reasons for his success are as follows. 1. Be able to endure what ordinary people cannot. 2. Be good at thinking and guessing others, whether strategically or strategically, and be diligent in thinking. 3. He has foresight, whether it was Cao Cao's initial recruitment, his confrontation with Zhuge Liang, or his later rebellion. 4. Having a good wife, with the help of his wife in the early stage, Cao Cao can take a breather. In my mid-term, I gave birth to several children and educated them well. 5. There is a group of smart and capable children who can support their ambitions. 6. Cultivated a group of Deadpools. There is a team. 7. Quickly occupy important places and political power. 8. Live long and live well. Defeated many powerful enemies. Sima Yi is not a timid person. I think he is a very powerful person. When he was small, he had to endure hardships and survive powerful opponents. And he worked hard to become a boss. When I started my career as a cowhide, I didn't get too carried away. I still maintained my caution so that others could not catch me. Even if others want to kick him out, they can't. Books worth reading and studying.

The humorous writing style shows the intertwined and different destinies of various influential figures in the late Han Dynasty. It is a rare good book to assist the Three Kingdoms.

The first half of the book is mediocre, but the plot becomes very exciting in the second half after Zhuge Liang's death. That's when Sima Yi really started to show off his talents and compete with Cao Wei. The author's evaluation of Sima Yi is also very meaningful. In the end, I feel that we can't learn from Sima Yi, but we can't understand Sima Yi.

I read the paper book three times, it's such a good book

It is not allowed to fully reflect Sima Yi's talents, but only to describe them.