From Game Development to Global Domination

I originally wanted to give it five stars, but when I saw the chapter on your leave request, I suddenly didn't want to give it. If you can write 1 million words, you can consider it! 😏😏😏😏

It's very interesting. Can the author include "Eternal Calamity"? 🥰🥰🥰

I hope it's single or two stars Author, what do you think? The other two people gave 15% of the shares to the heroine. Is there any explanation for it? After all, at the beginning, he basically had no funds and was fully supported by the heroine. The other two people didn't understand. He could definitely rely on these to find better people. With a salary of one million, he almost got 15% of the shares. What the hell, plus the heroine gave away 60%, the holding rate is low. If it is around 60%, it is not the controlling shareholder. Although it is not necessarily correct, it seems to be lower than this number. In other words, if someone acquires the shares of those two people plus the heroine's share, wouldn't it become that person's game? You can't be so brainless, especially if you give the other two people 15%. Because at this time, the heroine gave him 7 The capital of 100 million is completely enough for him to be ahead of others. Even if it is close, it will be completed later. The company of 100 million should be about the same, maybe even a little more, and it will give away shares. This thing is the worst thing to give away. This is a particularly big poisonous point. Of course, it is the kind of gift for no reason. If you are a good brother at first, you can understand it, but he has only worked in the same unit and he is so The reason for working hard is because there is a commission. It may be a percentage of how much the game earns, but it is definitely not a share of the game. Because the commission is gone, there is no need to give it. But if the shares are given to them and they change jobs, the shares will still be in their hands. Can they sell the shares? Can you not write a plot that is too stupid? You almost persuaded me to quit. I hope you can change the basics. It is written that those who play this kind of game cannot give away shares, because for many people this is a very difficult point. Of course, if the relationship is good enough, it is possible, but basically the gift will not exceed 5%. But giving away 15% to these two supporting characters is a bit dull. Some people will automatically block this paragraph and treat it as a stake in them, but I can't do it. I don't know how many people like me just can't stand it when they see this. Those who are a little guilty are fine enough to automatically ignore this paragraph, but if nothing happens, it will be very uncomfortable. The author hopes to see it changed. If you don't change it, I can't help it. I can barely accept it, but many people should be Although there is no shortage of people who can't accept this paragraph, there shouldn't be too many people who can accept this situation. It's not necessary to persuade some people to quit. It's okay to change it. Is there any big loss? It's just a suggestion. After all, if you change this paragraph, there should be a little more people who can accept it. Some people can't stand this kind of situation of giving away shares. Most of them. I like it, that is, all the shares belong to the protagonist. Of course, this is just my personal speculation. I don't know the specifics, but what I have seen is basically that many people who have given away shares will say that they cannot accept it at that period. Of course, it depends on what is given out. Sometimes, not many people say that the shares are given out. But to be honest, I can't accept the 15% of the two

After reading more than a dozen chapters, the presentation is basically fine. The male protagonist is a bit verbose, in his resignation and other parts, I always feel that the male protagonist is making sense. Of course, it may also be because I can't imagine the male protagonist's tone. In short, it doesn't make me feel good. I looked at the comment section, and it seems that someone gave a bad review because of the multiple female protagonists. I haven't seen that part yet, but I suggest that the author write what he originally wrote later. If the heroine is changed midway, more readers will be lost. To put it simply, it means not changing the audience of the book. I may have been too picky about reading books recently, so I haven't given five stars for a long time. I'll give the author a five star to see if I can get rid of my picky problems. (I originally planned to give it four stars) I have a small thought, that is, most of these books seem to be about games. So is it worth writing about friendship, love and even revolutionary friendship where game producers work together for good games? (It suddenly occurred to me that the author does not need to worry about it. The most important thing is not to change the audience)

I think it's okay. As long as this kind of game writing is not toxic, you can read it.

This book is very good. It is the best game book I have read besides Taita, so I don't want the author to be hasty. People should follow their true intentions when writing books and don't care too much about other people's opinions. I don't care what others think of you, but I will always support you. Come on

This book seems to suit my taste. Look at the reading time.

Very good, the plot is very good.

Good books, good books, good books 🙂 🙂 🙂 [admiration] [admiration] [admiration] [admiration] [admiration]

Chapter 54 is about to persuade half of the people to quit.