[Mind reading, sand sculpture heroine, music handsome]
Li Huanxin went out of school, and for the sake of her life, she told the world that Li Huanxin only loved Xie Yanjun, but Li Huanxin had gone somewhere else, and her body and soul had been replaced by someone else.
But Xie Yanjun, who was in a car accident, kept leaning towards her.
"If you don't like to see it, you can just slide in. Thank you."
"It has a little bit of prose. If you don't like it, you can find something else to read."
"Honey, I was wrong, I don't have Bai Yueguang," Xie Yanjun acted coquettishly with Li Huanxin like a little puppy.
Li Huanxin collapsed. I just wanted to save my life. Why was I followed by this shameless man?
Reader comments
I originally wanted to give it three stars. Generally speaking, it's not too over the top or too trivial. Those who don't like it are all three stars. But I saw a review that gave it one star and it's difficult to say it's easy, so I'll give you two stars.
Personal impression: The overall story line does not have any special ups and downs, and the emotional line comes out of nowhere. The heroine feels silly and sweet, and the heroine has a lot of aura. Mind-reading can arouse the male protagonist's interest in a different way, but the description in the article does not make me feel that this interest is love. The previous article also clearly stated that there is no love. I saw my highlight: I was interjecting between words, and I originally wanted to see if it was just a quick brushstroke, without focusing on the description. But I didn't particularly want to read the follow-up because I saw the author's response after the comment.
First of all: I only saw three comments, and I didn't see the previous author saying that you can say what you don't like or cross out if you don't like it. Secondly: Since the comment area is open, it is the readers' right to comment however they want. I think moral kidnapping is a very low-level thing. Finally: Readers' comments are similar to a buyer's show after online shopping. People who have not read it can use it as a reference. What you write is not easy is one thing, but you cannot morally kidnap others. Very down.
I originally wanted to give it three stars. Generally speaking, it's not too over the top or too trivial. Those who don't like it are all three stars. But I saw a review that gave it one star and it's difficult to say it's easy, so I'll give you two stars. Personal impression: The overall story line does not have any special ups and downs, and the emotional line comes out of nowhere. The heroine feels silly and sweet, and the heroine has a lot of aura. Mind-reading can arouse the male protagonist's interest in a different way, but the description in the article does not make me feel that this interest is love. The previous article also clearly stated that there is no love. I saw my highlight: I was interjecting between words, and I originally wanted to see if it was just a quick brushstroke, without focusing on the description. But I didn't particularly want to read the follow-up because I saw the author's response after the comment. First of all: I only saw three comments, and I didn't see the previous author saying that you can say what you don't like or cross out if you don't like it. Secondly: Since the comment area is open, it is the readers' right to comment however they want. I think moral kidnapping is a very low-level thing. Finally: Readers' comments are similar to a buyer's show after online shopping. People who have not read it can use it as a reference. What you write is not easy is one thing, but you cannot morally kidnap others. Very down.
Just so-so!
Very pretty
Very nice
Not bad!
Super pretty! ! ! [Learned][Understood]
Really nice