Taking Stock of Great Men: My Interview Shocked China

You misinterpreted Confucius's meaning and went to criticize Confucius, and even made Confucius crazy. You are really the one. At first, you praised Van Gogh as the best in the world, and then you misinterpreted and belittled Confucius for being discriminatory against women. You are really the one! Only women and villains are difficult to raise. Do you mean women? Lesbian Ru means "you", and Zi is Zigong. The original meaning should be: You are the only one Zigong who has trouble getting along with villains! Why does it discriminate against women? Can you still call Confucius crazy? "The Analects" is a disciple integrating the dialogue between Confucius and others. This sentence was said by Confucius to Zigong. Saying that educated people are discriminating against women?

Originally I wanted to search for The Three-Body Problem, but I saw this book in the search bar. I really regretted why I was curious to read it. I wrote about Van Gogh on National Day. Okay, I can tolerate it. But second Confucius, what are you doing? People who preach that benevolent people should love others as they do not want others to be treated and do not do to others are said to be misogynists. Even if it is possible, can you think about the background of the times? During the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, you told people that women also had great value. You let women be killed on the battlefield. Can you give me a try? Women are not as productive as men, but it is also a fact. But if you use the distorted Confucianism to criticize Confucius' thought, is it wrong? Confucius must also be blamed for binding his feet and seclusion, right? Confucius did not discriminate against women, but you insist that he does. Since the Han Dynasty deposed hundreds of schools of thought and only respected Confucianism, Confucian thought is no longer Confucius' thought. It is also said that Confucius did not educate women. At that time, it was difficult for common people to study, and books were held by nobles. You pointed at others and said that women were not given the opportunity to study. Are you sick? I've lost my mind. No more comments

It disgusts me to death. How do you know that Confucius despises women? It's just your own imagination. How can you belittle Confucius? Even if his teachings are misinterpreted by later generations, it is not his fault. How does he know about future generations? In ancient times, men were the main productive forces because of their low productivity. Reading and writing are good enough. In ancient times, there were also women from aristocratic families who were able to read and write, such as Cai Wenji and Li Qingzhao. Only women from good family backgrounds could be talented and learned. You said that there was a talented woman in history who was not from a noble family. Don't criticize ancient times from a modern perspective, okay? Only now that productivity has developed and there is enough surplus productivity can women go to school. Otherwise, it will still be the same as in ancient times.

Although I haven't read it, it doesn't affect my low score. Other people's comments can prove that you are worth 500,000. Report it and we'll go [awkward laugh]

Interviewing historical figures, some common sense mistakes, mechanical application, the whole article is messy, here and there, anticlimactic, a bad article written on a good subject

It feels like the author just wrote the article without knowing anything and did not consider it based on the actual situation at that time. Moreover, he praised foreign celebrities such as Van Gogh and belittled domestic celebrities such as Confucius. It is inappropriate to promote the idea of ​​female boxing

The writing style is not good, the plot connection is not good, and I didn't check the information before writing. What did Confucius mean by those words?

Brother, it's better to stop being a writer. Laughing Man 666666

The author, you are not a female boxer, right? You understood what Confucius said wrong, right? Confucius means "Only women who accompany the king and sinister villains are difficult to raise." Originally, future generations have misunderstood the meaning. Well, you also wrote about Confucius in this and that way. You will definitely not be able to write it without some serious illness.

I don't know anything about historical figures, so I just make random remarks.

Is the author a female? So protective of women's boxing

Hh What if he is really a foreigner? Didn't you read the title? Shocked China. I came up with this after reading a few chapters and a lot of comments

This is the first time in a long time that Confucius is written so poorly. Is there something wrong with the author? . . . . Although no one is perfect, the description in this book feels like it is slandering Confucius, and at the end, Confucius is described as being unyielding in admitting his mistakes. Reported (maybe a few people like to read it, but I personally don't like it so I use my rights as a reader)

I am speechless about the Confucius section.

Not this book.

The Confucius part is too bad

There's no reason why it's so bad One star cannot be downgraded

The characterization is not enough, the punctuation is missing, there are omissions and typos, in short: the sea, you are all water!

This still has 8.3 Points

It's causing war, it's disgusting, please take it off the shelves.

Not enough characterization, lots of typos

Too bad! !

Rotten

Nonsense,,,

Misinterpretation of Confucius' words

Not bad, the mood is good

Wai Ri, just come back to Chapter 5, don't read it.

The first 2 chapters are poisonous

This book is pure monsters

Tested for poison, don't watch