
The Brothers Karamazov (Two Volumes)
卡拉马佐夫兄弟(全二册)
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 677k Words
- Updated
- 8mo ago
- Source
- Fanqie
Stats
3.7kReads
9.5Score
1.8kShelves
117Chapters
401Listens
56.9kReads · all time
Tags
Synopsis
Reader comments
Readers also read
The Brothers Karamazov (Two Volumes)
The Brothers Karamazov (Set of Volumes 1 and 2)
The Brothers Karamazov (Volume 1 and 2)
The Brothers Karamazov (Selected Collections of Dostoevsky)
Geng Jizhi's Translation of the Brothers Karamazov (Translation Series by Chinese Translators)
The Brothers Karamazov: up and Down (Foreign Literature Masterpiece Series)
The Brothers Karamazov: All 2 Volumes (Selected Works of Dostoevsky)
"The Brothers Karamazov" uses the suspicion of patricide as a prism to reflect the life-and-death game between faith and nothingness. Ivan's "religious judge" allegorically judges the dilemma of theodicy, and Alyosha's kiss dissolves the iron curtain of reason. Dosage opened the abyss of human nature with polyphonic narrative - sin and redemption have the same origin, and free will bursts out the ultimate questioning in the silence of God. Five stars pay tribute to its spiritual archeology: when the blood of Karamazov boils, the Auschwitz and resurrection of the human soul tremble at the same frequency here.
Tuolao, where is the second part? Can I pick up the pen holder for you? [Cry]
I actually hesitated for a while whether to write a review of this book. Because this book is so precious to me, I cannot express my views on it with such a shallow understanding. I feel this is a sacrilege of the work... But I wanted to leave the mark of my first, uninformed perspective on the book. I want to remember that I was (and still am) devouring this book, absorbing every word of it. I will definitely reread this work several times in the future, because the first time I read it it was quite intermittent, and I have forgotten the thoughts that came to me for a moment. I can only tell a little bit about individual characters. I am not qualified enough to analyze the content of this book. Alyosha, my favorite character. My impression of him is actually vague: there are obviously many detailed descriptions of his thoughts in the book, so why is he still unclear? This uncertainty is even greater than that for Ivan. Perhaps because of the description of his thoughts at the beginning, I concluded that he actually did not believe in God, but that he really loved Elder Nazosima and Wujiwu. After Elder Zosima's death, he may have ceased to hold on to his love for God for a long time. In my eyes, he loves everything in the world more than God. Such a grand ideal cannot limit him to one belief. What I mean is: after he returns to secular life, he will accept many different positions and viewpoints, which will subvert his own way of dealing with people (perhaps it should not be said to be subversive, but should just have a greater impact...), And do things that people think he will not do. Besides, he probably shouldn't say vague, but rather ambiguous. He is willing to do anything he thinks is beneficial to the world, which will never limit him, a realist, to using religious beliefs to contribute to people. Elder Zosima is right about this. We can see that Alyosha is pure, as can be seen from the description of his childhood and behavior, but he is also tolerant, hiding his deepest love for everything, tolerating the noble and the filthy. I was really attracted to his childishness after Zosima's death, which made Alyosha no longer a saint, but a young boy who was guided by nobility. He will grow, which should be recorded later, but what makes me most regretful is that I will not be able to see his growth. I can't go into too much detail about the other characters. Since I didn't spread too much energy around each character... I can only recall some of the perspectives that I still have memories of. Ivan is arrogant, arrogant from beginning to end. He doesn't bother to explain his behavior because he thinks it's unnecessary to play the bullshit. He also arrogantly believed that Smer would be waiting for his trial, because Smer had no room to resist, and he did not expect that he would have the last extreme path. His thoughts and theories cannot work in the face of actual behavior, which is a huge blow to him. Just like he couldn't change the fate of those innocent children. His morality should be one of guilt: his failure to save his children and his father, his distrust of Mitya... This is his powerlessness. Looking at the opinions about Alyosha from different mouths, I increasingly realized that my initial understanding was too idealistic. I originally thought that Alyosha loved everyone equally, without any position or conditions, but just instinctively cared for and tolerated everyone. Looking at this idea now, it is really ideal. Alyosha is not a philanthropist without a bottom line. He has a very clear stance on good and evil. When faced with evil, he would not choose to inspire and guide people to repent, but would advocate serious punishment. Just like the words "shoot him" when he heard that a child was being abused, maybe it was not an impulse but his true attitude. This also allowed me to overturn the view that "Alyosha loves the world without distinction". In terms of Jesus-like love for the world, he should have tried to awaken the wicked and give them a way to repent, but Alyosha was not like that. He only judges rather than condones extreme evil. Alyosha's love is never vague and all-inclusive as I initially thought. It has edges, bottom lines, and unshakable principles. My initial intuition was good, but not real enough. Recalling Lao Ka's words "As long as people like me repent, can they be forgiven?" (Which may be different from the original text), at first I thought it was because of his provocative nature. Now I slap my forehead and exclaim: Dostoevsky wrote this paragraph and buried questions that will be answered later. The translator said that Alyosha was the indifferent person in this murder case, and was passive unlike other brothers who played a key active role in thoughts/actions. He coldly expected his father's death, so he fled to the monastery when he could have prevented it. In fact, this is not the case. In my eyes, Alyosha is powerless. Regardless of whether he wants his father to die or not, he cannot stop his brothers' deep-rooted resentment towards their father. Having said that, in fact all the characters are powerless. Mi Jia is capable but powerless - most of his crises can no longer be solved by thinking, so he can only act non-stop. Ivan is thinking but powerless—thinking too much makes any action seem powerless. In this way it is divided into thinking, action and love. Both are swallowed up by one end, and being swallowed up by one end means that they are also swallowed up together. But thinking and doing are the same topic and the same standard, right? Why does love appear here? Then do their thoughts and actions contain love; or is there no love at all, just full of self-interest as opposed to love? I don't need an answer, because I know philosophy can never spit out an answer. I just want to think about two questions: How to divide love? Is love higher than reality or is it subordinate to reality? After thinking about this, I can figure out whether Alyosha loves others or not.
The novel is quite thoughtful and the content is excellent, but the author has not finished it, so this is a pity. Tuo's writing style is a bit difficult to understand, so I have to read the parts I don't understand several times.
This book is very interesting! I especially like the illegitimate son Smerdyakov. Although he is very bad, his complexity is really attractive. This book made me understand that everyone is different and has their own story. Just like me, although I am not a big shot, I still have my own uniqueness!
The process of every life is not just about living, human nature is immortal, either glorious or depraved. Therefore, different mentality of seeking mutual sympathy always tears apart oneself and the society.
After reading it, I felt so complicated that I couldn't write anything. But it has been integrated into my thinking. Thanks to the author for the hopeful ending.
In fact, I couldn't stand it in the middle, but I had to do my literature homework and read it hard. But after reading it, it was quite interesting to reflect on it carefully. The plot of Mitya's trial in the middle was very interesting. I saw that Tuo Tuo was really prescient and foresaw that Russia would perish due to chauvinism. I felt really powerful when I saw this, and I really understood Russia very thoroughly. Generally speaking, it's okay, but after all, I came to read it with a mission, and I was somewhat resentful of it, so much so that I couldn't stand it for a while [laughing]
We will be kind first, that is most important, then righteous, and then - we will never forget each other. I haven't seen such a beautiful book for a long time.
It was my first time to read Tuo Weng's work, and then the words directly challenged this tome. I felt that, in my current words, uh, I felt that his plot settings were clever, especially. . . Old Karamazoraf treated women like women. . . It was just natural to get the whole plot line of humiliating that uh, that crazy woman. , So smooth that it reaches that kind of contradictory and intense style. I think Rong Rude's translation is good
We must know that the most noble spiritual power and the most beneficial feeling to the body and mind in future life are some kind of beautiful memories, especially the memories preserved from the hometown and former residence in childhood. People often talk to you about your education, and a certain beautiful and sacred memory preserved from childhood may be the best education. If one can go into life with many such memories, the person will be saved throughout his life.
No matter how you comment, it is all a deep thought and taste of one kind or another. What is resurrected is not only the attributes of reincarnation, but everything is the best arrangement, creating a miraculously giving life to a new talisman to exist.
It's extremely shocking, but it's a bit unfinished. If Dostoevsky had lived a few more years, he might have been able to write a second volume, making the story more complete and full.
It's so awesome. If it hadn't been Monday, I would have stayed up all night to read it. It's really breathtaking.
The five points are purely because it is the highest five points. There is no doubt that this book is an absolute masterpiece!
We will be saved
It was painful to read! But the most recommended one is the religious magistrate! When reading this book, it is best to understand the background of Russia at that time and the life of the author.
There must be a lot of things that I don't understand when reading a book like this (for me), but I also gained a lot and felt a lot. If you insist on reading to the end, you will be successful, haha
This book may be the best work of the author's life
Better to read than expected
A classic, must read
I will come back
Good Huajia Powder Abdominal Muscles
Very beautiful, I like it very much
A masterpiece, no need to say more
A little too real
This is comedy, joy After waking up for a while, I felt like something was wrong with me. Recalling the Flying Spur 3 I watched, it was a minister I probably won't be able to read online novels anymore
Super awesome novel
It should be good, I haven't finished it yet
Dostoyevsky,