Resurrection

"We shed tears for the unfortunate, and the joys and sorrows of mankind touch our hearts." Works that truly express human nature will still touch future generations no matter how time passes, because human nature is eternal. Nekhludoff, he ran to defend Maslova and asked to marry her to atone for his sins. After his appeal failed, he accompanied her into exile in Siberia. He loved, regretted, and reflected, and finally he decided that he was resurrected and reborn, and he found his moral standard in the complicated society. He gave up the aristocratic life, distributed the land to the peasants, cut off contact with the upper class society, and believed in religion devoutly. He was undoubtedly heading towards "resurrection". Similarly, with Nekhludoff's sincere repentance and care, Maslova eliminated her past grudges, gradually restored her past love, reawakened the virtues buried deep in her heart, and took the initiative to quit smoking and drinking. However, in order not to damage Nekhludoff's reputation and status, she refused to marry him and chose to marry Simonson, another prisoner she loved. This also led to her "resurrection".

In Resurrection, he did not use gorgeous words to dazzle the pictures, but used the most sincere feelings and the simplest handwriting to touch the hearts of readers. The resurrection of human nature prevails in the end anyway. This is what we want, and it is also a portrayal of Tolstoy's nature. The words in "Resurrection" tell the story of that era, express Tolstoy's deep sympathy for the people at the bottom, and also make us outside the book constantly reflect deeply on our own lives and the present. Resurrection can be not only Tolstoy's, but also Nekhlyudov's, and it can be for each of us. The complex environment and the humans who coexist with it are one and the same, simply expressing the tip of the iceberg of ourselves. You must know that we are much more than that. What do you want for yourself? Do you see the world as you want to see it? Resurrect yourself, live as yourself, let the beauty that has always been suppressed in your heart become what you want, and let the world appear beautiful in your eyes. This is the real resurrection.

Ashamedly, I came to read it just to complete the holiday homework assigned by the teacher. With the mentality of finishing my homework as soon as possible, and with the utilitarian intention of reading this famous book, I was distracted or read the book at a glance; maybe my ideological level is not high enough, or I do not understand the social conditions of that era, and I feel that I have gained nothing. And I read it with great difficulty. But this is one of the few masterpieces that I can read. In short, I hope I can calm down and read it carefully next time.

Resurrection tells the story of Khnelyudov's transformation from purity to spiritual degradation and then to regaining himself and seeking Maslova's forgiveness. The plot has ups and downs. There is both a twisted side of human nature and a beautiful and sincere side. At the same time, it reflects the author Tolstoy's criticism of human nature at that time, and also expresses that with the emergence of new ideas, some people realize that they need to redeem themselves and change human nature. This is why "Resurrection" is included in high school Chinese elective textbooks. Therefore, this book is really worth reading.

This is the first time I have read a complete book by Lie Lao. My knowledge reserve and life experience are not rich enough, and my understanding is somewhat lacking. However, the protagonist Nekhludoff is very realistic. When he comes into contact with the working people, he feels at ease and satisfied; Near the end of the novel, he also describes the comfort of his spirit and environment at the general's house with a group of thoughtful and insightful people, which is also very comfortable. I think this is another ideological improvement of the male protagonist. Learn to accept and forgive. Of course, the majority of working people still rank first in the hero's heart, because he is a very kind person no matter what time he is. Moreover, he is still a Duke, and his status is very high.

I was deeply impressed, but I read the physical book and read it in one sitting, which gave people deep thoughts. Although Nekhludoff did not end up with Maslova, I think this is the most perfect ending. Nekhludoff has received spiritual baptism, and Maslova has also been reborn. His combination with Simonson was accidental. If Maslova meets Simonson, then their combination is inevitable. Everything is developing in a good direction. This is the most perfect ending in my heart.

Tolstoy expressed his view of love to the world in one sentence: Everything is already doomed. "Everything is doomed." Faced with the male protagonist's confession, the female protagonist answered her choice in seven words. This was their last affectionate conversation. The love story about self-salvation comes to an abrupt end, leaving us with endless reverie. Different people have their own understanding of this sentence, just like there are a thousand Hamlets in the hearts of a thousand people. The first is that you and I have different origins and different classes and cannot be together at all; the second is that God arranged for you and me to meet, and my body and mind already belong to you; the third is that we are unable to fight against fate and can only accept the arrangement of fate. Dear friend, what do you think Tolstoy ultimately wanted to express, and which one do you like best?

This book reflects the dark society and people's moral loss at that time in every aspect. Nekhludoff himself was disgusted with this kind of life, but people changed due to the environment, so when he was in a dark environment, he became corrupted, which was beyond his control. This made me understand that good and evil are just a matter of thoughts, and as long as they are affected, earth-shaking changes will occur. Only by carefully grasping the boat of life can we not lose our way and maintain our true self forever.

The high school party came to report. The teacher kept asking me to read it. I finally read it today. It was very well written. Like it ❤️

The meticulous portrayal of Nekhludoff, especially his psychological description, allows readers to see the side of a man after resurrection: the courage to admit mistakes, the courage to face his own heart, and no regrets.

After reading this book, I remembered that sentence, when the world is dark, innocence becomes sin. The world that the male protagonist lives in is like this, hypocritical and dark. Whether to stick to oneself or join in the same trend, he tells us the answer through his actions. But how difficult it is to stick to yourself. When everyone accuses you, curses you, or even hurts you, how many people can stick to it. When reality and ideals conflict, and worldliness and faith conflict, what should we do? After all, we are not people in books and need to live.

The book is very good, but the Russian names are really long. At a glance, I thought there was a new person.

"He knew very well that everything considered important and beautiful was in fact small and mean; he also knew very well that all the splendor and pomp concealed long-standing and accustomed crimes. The perpetrators not only went unpunished, but also showed great airs and tried every means to whitewash and beautify the crimes."

The composition of famous works is complex, covering human nature, social systems, and the epitome of the times. It seems boring, but it is the sharpest and most valuable.

Very exciting! It is indeed a masterpiece 👍 I hope that no matter what environment I live in or what position I am in, I will at least maintain a kind and compassionate heart.

"Resurrection" is a book that shocks people deeply. It is like a mirror that allows us to see the darkness and ugliness deep within ourselves, while also allowing us to see the possibility of hope and redemption. Nekhludoff was once a passionate and ideal young man, but because of his impulsiveness and selfishness, he made an irreparable mistake. This mistake not only ruined his own life, but also Maslova's. However, when he met Maslova again many years later, he was deeply touched. He began to reflect on his past and try to make amends for his crimes. This process is full of pain and struggle, but also full of hope and courage. Everyone is likely to make mistakes, but everyone has the opportunity to correct their mistakes and achieve self-salvation. This process is not easy and requires courage, determination and firm belief. But as long as we are willing to try, to reflect on our past, and to pay attention to the pain and needs of others, it is possible for us to find the light within and achieve true resurrection.

Resurrection is the emergence of the good humanity in the hero's heart, the sublimation of rationality that has defeated the bestiality, the inner fluctuations caused by strong emotions towards things, and the struggle and transformation from bestiality to rationality. Therefore, resurrection can be the spiritual sublimation of human nature, the continuation of tragedy, or the beginning of everything.

I realized that the abridged version I had hidden in my book pocket in middle school was probably an abridged version. Now I spent a week reading "Resurrection" again. I felt it was different from when I was in middle school. At that time, I only remembered that "resurrection" had a double meaning. Nekhludoff's soul was resurrected; Maslova's personality was resurrected. The corruption and prejudice of the system can never be completely resurrected by individual atonement, nor can it be resurrected. The selfishness, greed and indifference deep in human nature can never be completely eradicated. But the process of a lifelong game, struggle, and introspection with one's own bad nature is itself the most noble salvation in the world and the never-ending spiritual resurrection of mankind.

What was resurrected was not just the resurrection of Nekhludoff, but the resurrection of the entire human nature. From the fate of small characters to the fate of this people, from human nature to bestiality, from micro to macro.

Nekhludoff gave me an image of a 'self-moved' character, but it is undeniable that what he did did help others escape their suffering. But I doubt whether his heart has been reborn.

As expected of you all, the ability to control language is really powerful. I have a small regret that the names are too long.

Redeem your own fall in the fall, see your sin in the confession. At first I thought it was the body that needed to be saved, but later I found out it was the soul, and then I found out that the only thing that can really be saved is my own soul. We are all on our own pilgrimage.

The novel describes that the protagonist was born in the upper class. When he was young, due to his special environment and special family background, he did some ridiculous things. It can be seen that the protagonist received a good education, and he has always been guilty deep down in his heart. But when you live around these sinful people, it is not easy to detect the uneasiness in your heart. Until he accidentally met the woman he hurt, the original sin deep in his heart was aroused, allowing him to find the meaning of life. When we thought he was only rescuing the woman for atonement, we truly saw the simplicity and kindness in his heart. It seemed that he was taking on things that had nothing to do with him for that woman, but in fact it was what he was really willing to do in his heart. Like a savior, he gradually uncovered the ugly scars of this sinful aristocratic society, and later when he returned the land he owned to the people, you discovered that he was a great philosopher, because it is impossible for ordinary people to do it. From this book, I can intuitively reflect on the fact that the current society is experiencing the torture of the disease. Looking at the people in this society who are pursuing aristocratic life without restraint, I can clearly see the disease of the society and reflect on it step by step. As I watched the protagonist go through changes in his thoughts from chapter to chapter, it seemed as if there was a voice that was constantly mercilessly accusing or even cursing me in my heart, which made my shame evident. This is a soul-cleansing book.

Reading classics is meaningful! Resurrection, the resurrection of humanity! Tolstoy's top work! The excitement of life!

"Resurrection" is the pinnacle of Tolstoy's thought and art in his later years. Through the intertwining fate of the noble Nekhlyudov and the serf Maslova, it profoundly exposes the corruption and injustice of Tsarist Russian society. The novel explores human nature, redemption and social responsibility with delicate psychological description and strong moral criticism. Through the protagonist's awakening and repentance, Tolstoy expressed his desire for social reform and his profound insight into human nature. It is both realistic and critical, and full of philosophical thinking. It is a shocking literary classic.

It is a classic masterpiece with depth and courage. It is not something that ordinary people dare to say, write and do. It is amazing!

I don't know how you feel. What impressed me most was not the sentence about people's society, but Katyusha's sentence in Chapter 48: "You want me to save you." As soon as this sentence came out, it had a huge impact on me. In the novel, Nekhludoff is not a good person, he is a "sinner" with a conscience, and it is because of his disgrace that the character has a shadow. The starting point of Nekhludoff's resurrection is just as Katyusha said, for himself. Although he later recognized more people at the bottom, he could not change his initial "self-interested self-confidence." In contrast, I have a preference for Katyusha. When she shouted this sentence, I was so serious that I was stunned for a long time. Her resurrection did not have any purpose like Nekhludoff, but more of a resurrection of a silent heart. Everything about her was altruistic from beginning to end. Whether before or after her resurrection, she devoted herself to others without hesitation. Her intelligence and vision are not an empty vase. She knows everything and understands everything. But for such a person to be so destroyed by society, it shows the society at that time. Why is this sentence so impressive? You might as well think about it, whether it is today's social network, interpersonal relationships, or contemporary novels, a kind of "redemption literature" has been derived. People need to be saved and saved by others. Is this really right? Of course, this does not mean that this kind of literary production is wrong, but I just hope to explore the starting point of this kind of literature and the reflection of contemporary people's spiritual needs and social value deep in its core. It is true that people need support from the outside world. It is as expressed in this literature that one person shares the power of his love and care with another person, thereby causing that person to change his current life situation and move towards a better aspect. But have we ever thought about it? Does the other party really need this kind of redemption? Can people become better only by relying on others? It was so alive when she said it, and it dawned on me at that moment. The real resurrection never requires the salvation of others, but your own salvation from a certain moment on. The only person who can truly save yourself is yourself. Katyusha realized this. From the moment she said these words, in my heart, she had already begun her own redemption. I don't know what everyone thinks, but this is my little thought

The greatness of Tolstoy's works is that it not only promotes the greatness of human nature, the process of human liberation and transformation, but also profoundly reveals the darkness and decadence of society, the rampage of bureaucrats and aristocrats, the pity of ordinary people, and the courage to speak the truth.

This book is more in line with personal tastes, with some human thoughts and philosophical views.

The plot has ups and downs, the inner activities are described delicately, and the language is full of philosophy.