Well, Ni Cang admitted that his robot seemed to be different. Even the most high-tech optical brain intelligent robot was not as outrageous as the one in front of him.
Have you ever seen a robot go into a daze?
Have you ever seen a robot that can eat?
Have you ever seen a robot that can take a shower?
What kind of material is this robot made of? Can he return it?
Reader comments
First of all, the creativity of the whole article is quite good. It is rare to see such creativity.
But this is the only advantage
The first is the power of writing. It is obvious that the author's writing power cannot hold down such a grand world view. I feel like I am being carried away by the article.
The second is the name of the character. I don't know what kind of psychology the author had in making up such a name. It has the flavor of the Mary Suuwen that was popular ten years ago.
The third is punctuation. The exclamation point is so standard that I can't help but wonder if this is the only punctuation mark on the author's keyboard.
The fourth is the modal particles. There are many and they are very single. Basically, the word "" is popular all over the world, and the place where it appears is very inappropriate. It is used in narration and speaking, especially when a tough-minded man speaks with it. He is really good at acting.
Fifth, the language expression is very... Magical. It spans too much and cannot keep up with the rhythm at all. The paragraphing is also very unreasonable. Some paragraphs are only one page without even punctuation. I can understand that the author wants to express his thoughts as clearly as possible, but it does have the opposite effect.
Sixth, the author's game is too broad. As mentioned before, the author's skills are not deep, which leads to some pitfalls in the later stage that the author cannot get back to, giving people the feeling of a foot-binding cloth.
The summary is that if you want to approve elementary school students' compositions, or rebuild your self-esteem, improve your confidence in your writing, or train your emotional control, this book is worth reading. Others are not recommended at all, and I don't recommend it to those who read Mary Sue's essays. At least they won't use one exclamation point for every sentence, but one for every two sentences.
The plot is quite good. Even if the emotions go over too quickly, it still captures the key points. However, too many sentences like "there" and "there" made me feel a little helpless.
First of all, the creativity of the whole article is quite good. It is rare to see such creativity. But this is the only advantage The first is the power of writing. It is obvious that the author's writing power cannot hold down such a grand world view. I feel like I am being carried away by the article. The second is the name of the character. I don't know what kind of psychology the author had in making up such a name. It has the flavor of the Mary Suuwen that was popular ten years ago. The third is punctuation. The exclamation point is so standard that I can't help but wonder if this is the only punctuation mark on the author's keyboard. The fourth is the modal particles. There are many and they are very single. Basically, the word "" is popular all over the world, and the place where it appears is very inappropriate. It is used in narration and speaking, especially when a tough-minded man speaks with it. He is really good at acting. Fifth, the language expression is very... Magical. It spans too much and cannot keep up with the rhythm at all. The paragraphing is also very unreasonable. Some paragraphs are only one page without even punctuation. I can understand that the author wants to express his thoughts as clearly as possible, but it does have the opposite effect. Sixth, the author's game is too broad. As mentioned before, the author's skills are not deep, which leads to some pitfalls in the later stage that the author cannot get back to, giving people the feeling of a foot-binding cloth. The summary is that if you want to approve elementary school students' compositions, or rebuild your self-esteem, improve your confidence in your writing, or train your emotional control, this book is worth reading. Others are not recommended at all, and I don't recommend it to those who read Mary Sue's essays. At least they won't use one exclamation point for every sentence, but one for every two sentences.
The plot is quite good. Even if the emotions go over too quickly, it still captures the key points. However, too many sentences like "there" and "there" made me feel a little helpless.