The Tang Dynasty's visiting son-in-law wanted to take a concubine? Do you agree? Anyway, the real wife is looking forward to a divorce as soon as possible. Does she have someone else in her heart? Do you want to do business in a family that has been a scholar for generations? Dream on! You have become a big businessman, but you are also a leek waiting to be harvested. The traitor has sharpened the sickle!
Reader comments
Why doesn't anyone comment? No one commented, so I just said a few words.
First of all, the male protagonist's first woman, "Taizhen", was the woman who later became the emperor. I really don't know whether the male protagonist cuckolded the emperor or the emperor cuckolded the male protagonist. Although the author has not finished writing, according to the author's previous meaning, Concubine Yang should be dead later. I feel that there is no need to write this "Taizhen" character, or that "Taizhen" and Yang Guifei should not be written as the same person. After all, she is the first woman of the male protagonist, and she is also the most at ease with the other woman. Later you wrote him as the emperor's woman. What does that mean? Isn't this annoying to watch?
I also always feel that the sentences in the article read strangely, not smoothly, and a bit stumbling.
Of course, this is just a personal opinion, don't criticize if you don't like it. The article still has something to offer. Readers need to understand it well.
Self-entertainment, written by the author for himself
Why doesn't anyone comment? No one commented, so I just said a few words. First of all, the male protagonist's first woman, "Taizhen", was the woman who later became the emperor. I really don't know whether the male protagonist cuckolded the emperor or the emperor cuckolded the male protagonist. Although the author has not finished writing, according to the author's previous meaning, Concubine Yang should be dead later. I feel that there is no need to write this "Taizhen" character, or that "Taizhen" and Yang Guifei should not be written as the same person. After all, she is the first woman of the male protagonist, and she is also the most at ease with the other woman. Later you wrote him as the emperor's woman. What does that mean? Isn't this annoying to watch? I also always feel that the sentences in the article read strangely, not smoothly, and a bit stumbling. Of course, this is just a personal opinion, don't criticize if you don't like it. The article still has something to offer. Readers need to understand it well.
Self-entertainment, written by the author for himself