Immortality

If the overall quality of human beings cannot meet the minimum requirements for mastering technology, then no matter how advanced technology is, it will be a Pandora's box.

It's a pretty good book. There's nothing wrong with the structure, but the concept isn't very interesting. What can I say about the character's character and image? There are good and bad. The length lies in my personal opinion that it could be longer and the setting of suspense. When Goode died, I already guessed that it was not like this. The subsequent cloning confirmed my guess. After reading the whole book, I think it is not bad. As long as the plot is richer, the story is longer, and the details are more detailed, I think it will be just right.

This novel is really well written, with science fiction, suspense, morality, and the author's amazing imagination! It's a brain-burning, effortless movie worth watching.

Goode is really a talented person, and the future development direction of the earth is also very realistic, either social and technological progress, or social regression. Just in the blink of an eye...

Science fiction intersects the future, and life shows humanity.

It's comparable to ball lightning. It's well written and has a very visual feel. Immortality is not scary, but what is scary is the immortality of all people. Those who live forever must live in seclusion, similar to the immortals who reach the sky.

The logic is good, but there are some flaws. In fact, I have always believed that good ethics and advanced ideas are the criteria for deciding whether to preserve or apply technology. We cannot deny the significance of the existence of this technology, including whether this technology should exist. What we should be concerned about when this technology appears is whether humans can clearly see the impact of this technology and the future direction of mankind. To put it bluntly, it is a matter of vision. In fact, what I find very interesting is that people have created classes and created artificial information gaps, which ultimately led to the emergence of a mob, making leadership more and more important. When problems arise, they blame the public for having no vision and being inconsiderate. But if we want everyone to have clear judgment, or to have clear judgment when facing temptation, we must break this information gap, and people themselves are creating this information gap. This information gap allows some people to profit from it, and successful profit-making causes those who make profits to think that they are very smart, and gain joyful emotions or a superior mentality (to put it simply, they are happy because of profits), so they start to get worse and continue to create information gaps. This seemingly clever existence is a major problem that hinders the development of human civilization. (Don't rise to any level. I don't mean to accuse anyone. I'm just describing a phenomenon.) So this is one of the reasons why the country has been preventing involution in recent years (personal guess). Once the information gap is formed, it is difficult to break. On the contrary, the country will have to pay the price for development. If the information gap does not get bigger and bigger, people will gradually stop paying attention to other things and just focus on this. Problems will arise in the direction of education, making the entire education system go further and further away from the right path. Finally, I would like to say that the above is just a comment. If you are not convinced, you can argue with reason, but don't curse, don't make random comments, and don't make chaos.

In fact, the longer the life span, the more likely it is that human intelligence will be developed, science and technology will usher in a new round of leaps, and the stars and the sea can become interstellar villages. Since nuclear energy has not wiped out mankind, there is no need to be so afraid of increasing life span. In my opinion, maybe if we give humans a little more time, we can invent something that can extend life indefinitely without consuming too many resources? To exaggerate, spiritual support is generated from the human body, but once this support is established, it will obtain a status that transcends the body itself, so we do not necessarily pursue eternal life.

"God doesn't wear a watch, but we are only human after all!"

I have to say that I think it is really good. Everyone must read different things in this book, and even read it at different times, and their opinions will also change. I saw quite a lot in it, including the debate about human nature (while blocking privileges while enjoying privileges), and the debate between technological development and stability (whether to allow the huge changes brought about by big breakthroughs or ban big changes for the sake of stability). Breakthroughs prevent the destruction caused by the changes it brings), the birth of a new class pyramid (constructed by the right to know, the top class has the right to know everything, and the lower class cannot enjoy it, so as to prevent breaking the existing management system), the position of technology and nature (whether to rely on technology to selectively develop safely or let nature take its own course, which one is higher)... There is a lot to think about, everyone can also share your thoughts [Blow kiss]

The word "filtering" is really scary to think about. When the power is in the hands of a few people, what is filtered out may be "unsafe" technology, or it may be any "unsafe" person. The "sun molecule" that can make people live forever will only be something that a few people can "enjoy". The people at the bottom will only have fewer and fewer "resources". "God doesn't wear a watch, but we are only human beings after all." Fragile human beings.

The filter is right, Goode is right, human nature is right, no one is wrong

Published ones are just different. The plot has ups and downs, the scenes are grand, the details are meticulous, the description of human nature is worthy of everyone's thinking, and the imagination is rich. A lot of foreshadowing came true, and the ending was beyond everyone's imagination.

I finished reading it in one day, it was so cool. This work is worth pondering. When people have the possibility of immortality, how will their future develop?

It's not so much science fiction as it is thinking about the future.

The plot is really exciting, and the ending of Good Life is really a vivid O. Henry-style ending. This is the first time I have encountered such a vivid image since I learned what an O. Henry-style ending is.

2025.12.15.12.00 This is the second book I have read by this author. It starts with a story about a person who invented the elixir of life, and then a series of things that happened. From the perspective of civilians, from the perspective of the rich, from the perspective of politicians, different voices come from different perspectives. This causes the reader to think and what the author wants to express. Everything has two sides, both good and bad. The development of such a drug is undoubtedly a good thing for the powerful, rich and powerful people, but it may not be a good thing for the poor people. It is human nature to want to live a long life, but it may not necessarily be a good thing based on one's own circumstances. An old man in the book said it very well. He was already over sixty years old and would live for several decades more. In addition, he could only be raised by his son in these decades, and he had no ability to work. As a kind and simple common people, this was suffering rather than enjoyment. The mysterious organization in the book also considers many ways to assassinate the inventor and related personnel and eliminate the drug. It is also for this reason. The book is very good and quite interesting to read.

This is a book that contains science fiction and suspense. The author's amazing imagination makes the story very exciting, but it is not a brain-burning one. It is worth reading. It tells the truth that science is developing faster and faster, people have powerful technological power, and their desires are getting bigger and bigger. Human beings begin to expect hundreds of years of life, or even eternal life. When desires are endless, human beings will eventually be destroyed! As the author of the book says, "Simply extending the length of life will only bring disaster to civilization, just like using external force to stretch an earthworm infinitely. It will break, die, and may or may not be reborn. But even rebirth is conditional and not unlimited."

I'm not the type to be happy without thinking. If you were forced to live hungry and cold, would you choose to live to 90 or 360?

Thoughtful, in-depth, a good novel.

A great idea and observation of the human world, very interesting and thought-provoking

The Tao can be Tao, but it is not the eternal Tao. A name can be named, but it is not a permanent name. Nameless is the beginning of all things; named is the mother of all things. Therefore, if you always have no desire, you can observe its desire; if you always have desire, you can observe its desire. They come from the same place, have different names and the same predicate. Mysterious and mysterious, the gate of all evil.

The increasing level of science and technology will eventually be unable to satisfy human desires. When desires are endless, human beings will eventually be destroyed!

The writing style of this book is very unique, the writing is concise and powerful. The actions and thoughts of the characters are deeply portrayed, making me feel as if I could feel their struggle and determination. The story is full of thoughts about the future of mankind and is very thought-provoking. I think this is a book worth reading!

The ending is very pessimistic, just like my own opinion, the ending is a bit rushed, the apocalyptic scene depicted is acceptable, the story is also well advanced, stay alive

After watching it, I thought it was pretty good. In summary, I feel contented and happy.

One of the best science fiction works I have read in recent years!

This book is broad-minded and unconstrained! It vividly depicts the world pattern between immortality and destruction.

Very good, no less than Liu Cixin

It's really good