My Diary of Immortal Life Was Exposed in the First Emperor's Mausoleum

It is extremely poisonous. It is difficult to read this book without thinking. It is suitable for people under 16 years old. Because this is their knowledge blind spot, they cannot see that there is no logic in this book from top to bottom. If you write it in a fantasy style, I can use mystery to dissolve these logical illogicalities, but this is not a fantasy style. It is impossible for an adult to read this kind of novel without thinking, so it is very poisonous.

Why do you always have to compare your own common sense with the content of a cool article? If you follow your common sense everywhere, you won't be able to read many cool articles. Just the first portrait. Let's not talk about how to tell that he is a handsome man in his twenties with good skin. The portraits from the beginning of Qin Dynasty are still so clear. There are also a bunch of bamboo slips. I'm not convinced by logic here, okay? I've been keeping bamboo slips as diaries since the age of dinosaurs. The core of this novel is to expose it to all mankind. Everything is related to the protagonist. The protagonist is a walking history book. The content is originally fictional. It is not real history. Since it is not real history, why should we use common sense to flaunt him? You can complain that he is illogical, but you cannot say that he is illogical, just like Wu Zetian and Ying Zheng in The King are from the same era. Do you think this is common sense? No, because it is fictional.

I thought I could just put my mind aside and read novels, but it wasn't until I read this book that I realized it was useless to put my mind aside.

The novel does not need to be consistent with common sense, but it must be logical and reasonable in your article, such as cultivating immortals and practicing energy to live forever. The golden elixir of enlightenment, the Gangsha Yuanshen, the saint, and the mythical Daluo are all contradictory systems, but in these novels they are logically self-consistent. And how did your bamboo slips survive for tens of millions of years? How did you tame a Triceratops in 30 days? How did a sliding shovel break one of the Tyrannosaurus rex's legs? How did a Tyrannosaurus remain motionless while one leg, two claws, head and mouth were intact and you stoned it to death? How did a Tyrannosaurus rex with a body length of more than ten meters and a head height of nearly 6 meters and a weight of about 15 tons be kicked into the pool? How do you conclude that your time is November 23, **10,000 AD without any reference. It's not that in ancient times, there were dynasties and major events, and if you have a good history and a reference, you can convert them. There is also the modern archeology of **10,000 AD, where you traveled not to the past but to the future.

Well! The timeline is confusing, the logic is confusing, and the protagonist doesn't appear for a long time. You can watch it without thinking, and it's even pretty good. However, if you're a critic, a logician, or someone with obsessive-compulsive disorder, just leave - the 13,968th generation of the Shennong family.

Haha, I was addicted after reading the first chapter. These geologists are so awesome. The landscape has not changed for thousands of years.

Didn't you find the blind spot? Those dinosaurs are the names we give them in modern times. Why don't you pay attention to how an ancient person knew it, but to pay attention to whether they were bragging?

**It was calculated in AD more than 10,000 years ago, and the length units were the same. This is really awesome. But fortunately, I can still bear it. I haven't been poisoned to death for the time being. I'll give it a try for you guys.

The crystal was broadcast live and was blocked on the high seas. It was searched and subsequently kept secret. One of the relevant personnel in the book was dismissed. They were all dismissed, sent to jail, and even eaten peanuts. It was not an exaggeration to be able to write such a book.

When you see the diary, shouldn't you immediately wonder why the ancients had the concept of Tyrannosaurus Rex and Triceratops? Aren't these names modern?