When the movie spends a lot of time envisioning and building its own depth, it ignores many logical self-consistency issues. Especially at the end of the movie, there is not much time left for human problems, and when it comes to how to end, the movie is extremely perfunctory, although Avalanche can be seen as an intriguing self-made work. It's a sin, but how could so many people make such a big noise under the snow-capped mountains without thinking about the avalanche problem? It's even more ridiculous that the orangutans can climb trees and all escape the disaster. Even Caesar's death in the end is just a matter of time. This approach inevitably makes the movie look anticlimactic.
Although the ending of the movie is a little weak, it does not cover up the clear layers of reflection from human nature to society to war. An epic that is not caused by war makes the final battle not disappointing but also brings unexpected surprises.
This novel and its characters are purely fictitious. Any similarity is purely coincidental and should not be imitated.