Livestream: It All Starts with Poetry Lessons!

Discussions of academic issues must be supported by evidence and evidence, not made up. Your lecture was purely for fun and you did not provide evidence to support your point of view. Can it be considered a lecture to impart knowledge? Yi Zhongtian's talk about the Three Kingdoms is interesting, and there are historical data to support his views. And is there any evidence for what you said? For example, if you say that Li Bai is from Suiye City, you have to provide evidence and cannot just say it casually. If you say that Li Bai knows swordsmanship, you have to provide evidence, otherwise it is just an anecdote and not real academic knowledge. Although I also think Li Bai is a swordsman. So you have to have evidence, otherwise you don't use real people. You can talk about Li Hei, the Poet Immortal, and then cite evidence, even if it is made up, after all, it is a novel, as long as it conforms to the setting logic. But if you want to know the real Li Bai, you must have real evidence.

How did Li Bai become a Russian? What has changed? Mixed race person, you are deliberately distorting history.

Don't mislead others. Li Bai's father had an ominous birth and death year. According to legend, he was exiled to the four towns, and there is no document recording where his ancestral home is? It was Guo Moruo who said that his father was from Suiye City, but he did not say that Li Bai was Russian, and this was just a guess and conjecture. The probability of this guess is not as reliable as that of someone who was born in Longxi. Are you, a lecturer, so sure? Furthermore, Suiye City also belonged to the Tang Dynasty, and the Turks were either killed or enslaved at that time, so Li Bai could not have such a high status.

What Teacher Dai Jianye said is very interesting and there is evidence. You are just talking nonsense. It is not convincing at all and the subject matter is a good one. The author pulls the crotch**

In the first year of Chang'an (701), Li Bai, courtesy name Taibai. His birthplace is generally believed to be Qinglian Township, Changlong, Mianzhou (Brazil County), Jiannan Road, Tang Dynasty. His ancestral home is Tianshui, Gansu. His family background and family are unknown. According to the "New Book of Tang", Li Bai is the ninth grandson of Emperor Xingsheng (Liang Wuzhao King Li Hao). According to this statement, Li Bai has the same ancestry as the kings of Li and Tang Dynasties, and is a contemporary of Tang Taizong Li Shimin.

So stupid, using that recovery cloak in broad daylight

A victim of the Crying Temple Case, I don't know what the author's mentality was like when he talked about his old age in a joking way. Which teacher would be so cheerful when talking about an unjust case?

Let's just talk about Li Bai. No one in the audience asked him for the authenticity of what he said. As a teacher, teaching history does not require excerpts from historical records to prove it. Shouldn't talking about history be well-founded? Where is the evidence? That book? Which paragraph. Even if you tell a story about history, it should have a beginning and an end, one sentence here and there, that year, those years. . . . , Also speechless. Anyway, I am**

There is no relevant document in history that records that he was the second swordsman of the Tang Dynasty. The only thing that records the strength of Li Bai's swordsmanship is his own poems describing his swordsmanship. I write it myself, it's hard to say whether it's true or not. There is also no record of Li Bai competing with other swordsmen in the literature. So how can we infer that he is the second swordsman of the Tang Dynasty? Miyamoto Musashi is the first swordsman in Japan. He competed one by one for this title and defeated so many swordsmen before he could compete. Although his reputation as the number one is not good, but he can innovate swordsmanship and there are still people learning it, he should still have a little bit of skill.

It's not that you can't say it like this. At least you have to have supporting evidence. Is it still teaching if you just make jokes like this without supporting evidence??? In class, author brother. Is teaching all such nonsense?