I Am a Monk! The Tathagata's Madman, Slayer of Sin

Sacrificing one's body to return to sin, formless reincarnation, the end of Dharma, and burial in the sky

To be honest, I don't like Buddhism very much, because Buddhism in other martial arts gives people a feeling of hypocrisy, but Buddhism in a difficult situation doesn't know why I can't find a reason to hate him.

Are demons evil? Is Wanwan evil? Don't tell me that they haven't harmed innocent people, something you can't do yourself! Are multiplayer cheats evil? Is it evil to tease a woman? Killing is to protect life, killing karma is not killing people! What lofty words you said have become an excuse for you to deceive others. It's really funny that such a person who is evil himself and still harbors evil wants to try to kill evil and condemn sin! If you really want to kill the evil and condemn the crime, I'm afraid you won't be able to escape this punishment! If you covet beauty, you covet beauty. If you covet martial arts, you covet martial arts. You dress yourself up and look upright, as if the whole world is not just evil people, but you also steal the oath of the Buddha's sword. It's just ****! He is nothing more than a hypocrite!

Do it for yourself! There's nothing to say, but don't do evil things in the name of justice! Grabbing the secret book is grabbing the secret book, and being lustful is lustful! Why do so many people talk about the protagonist? It's because he is so different from the monk in Perak, he is not pure enough! The monks in Perak all act according to their own beliefs! I read someone said that a one-page book and a Buddhist sword have killed innocent people. I don't deny this, but I don't deny it either in a one-page book or in the Buddhist sword! They won't say that killing innocent people is a just thing! Although some are for various reasons, some are not because of their original intention. But if you do it, you do it, and they won't deny it. They will only strengthen their original beliefs, because once they let go of their beliefs, the sacrifices of those they sacrificed will be in vain! But they have never killed innocent people for martial arts and beauty, right?!

Maha Ni was willing to become a demon for Shi Tiancang, and he did kill many innocent people. Although he also did many good deeds, he was indeed a demon, and there was nothing wrong with this in the first place. Author, can you please stop misinterpreting it? I also like Mahanai very much, but I don't deny that he is indeed a figure of demon and Buddha.

I really decided to tell you, **author, maybe your writing is very good, but there is a problem with the concept of good and evil, right and wrong. Just for Huang Rong, you let Huang Laoxie go? And Hong Qigong is an upright man, others can let him go, but he can't? I don't understand, **

Li Xunhuan is really a pervert. I don't know what he thinks. Can his wife let him go? You think you don't want to be together anymore and quit by yourself, but you still try to match up your fiancée and other people. It's so funny. Such a person with three different views can't hide the fact that he is a coward and a waste no matter how hard he tries.

I don't like the protagonist's attitude towards women. I feel like he has to get in on every woman, especially Tian Yan. He also forcibly kissed someone, and it felt like a harem novel, like a prodigal son wearing a Buddha's coat, which made people unhappy. The authors of Feilu are all like this. If they don't have sex with a few women, it feels like they can't write.

Even if you are not upright, you still have to kill evil. If you do bad things yourself, it is okay. If others do bad things, it is evil, so you must kill evil. Double standards*.

What stupid name does the author give to the protagonist? I feel uncomfortable with this name, and a senseless anger rises up every time I look at it.