"Boss Ye Chu, reserve a hundred traitors for me next time. I want free coolies in my mining area!"
"Boss Ye Chu, save a few Japs for me next time. I killed a few during my boxing practice last time. It's not satisfying!"
"Boss Ye Chu, when will you bring back a captain? I want to be a urinal!"
"Boss Ye Chu, I heard that you captured a general and the price is negotiable. I have a hundred years of anger to vent here!"
"Boss Ye, what is the starting price for the imperial concubine?"
Island country: "We strongly condemn Ye Chu for abusing prisoners of war and violating the convention. We ask Ye Chu to stop this behavior immediately, and we also ask the Great China to give us an explanation."
China: "Don't be pushy. If you have the skills, you can fight until World War II!"
Ye Chu traveled back to the Anti-Japanese War era, carrying a human trafficking system, and live broadcasting the trafficking of islanders around the world, so the world went crazy and the Japanese were dumbfounded.
This novel and its characters are purely fictitious. Any similarity is purely coincidental and should not be imitated.
Reader comments
Don't criticize if you say something that doesn't sit well with you. First of all, for this World War II-era novel, it is a good thing for the protagonist to return home, but he is not very optimistic about the protagonist's external thoughts. It is a very ancient thought. His own abilities and skills are not good enough, but he is arrogant and thinks that others are just scum. Second, I strongly agree with killing the enemy, but if the protagonist is trafficking in people, there is not much difference between this approach and the other party's behavior. It is just a different method. Why do you do the same behavior in the name of revenge? The third one is also the worst. After the protagonist sells the person to modern times, he is brutally injured and killed. Is the current law still necessary? No matter what, it is a life, and the woman is probably sold to thousands of people. How is that different from the situation during World War II? So, it's better to kill him directly.
Don't criticize if you say something that doesn't sit well with you. First of all, for this World War II-era novel, it is a good thing for the protagonist to return home, but he is not very optimistic about the protagonist's external thoughts. It is a very ancient thought. His own abilities and skills are not good enough, but he is arrogant and thinks that others are just scum. Second, I strongly agree with killing the enemy, but if the protagonist is trafficking in people, there is not much difference between this approach and the other party's behavior. It is just a different method. Why do you do the same behavior in the name of revenge? The third one is also the worst. After the protagonist sells the person to modern times, he is brutally injured and killed. Is the current law still necessary? No matter what, it is a life, and the woman is probably sold to thousands of people. How is that different from the situation during World War II? So, it's better to kill him directly.