Great Qin: Why Are You Crying When I Don't Unite the Six Kingdoms?

Without Qin Shihuang at the beginning, there might have been dozens more countries.

The next time a book is published without me, Emperor Gaozu of the Han Dynasty, who does Ying Zheng mean to you??

Good guys don't even act anymore. I just want to mention one thing, it turns out that the welcome to Pei Gong was caused by Liu Bang's brain control of the locals, right? No matter how much other novels here praise Qin Shihuang, they don't directly put it in his face, and you are even more important. He was punished to build the Great Wall.

What should I say? I was wrong. What Ying Zheng should have been boasting about was building the Great Wall, preventing the Huns, and unifying the culture. Sweeping the six kingdoms is really nothing to brag about. I saw someone in the book review section comparing the Three Kingdoms to the destruction of the six kingdoms. I really laughed. Look at the configuration of the Three Kingdoms. Which one of Sun Quan, Liu Bei, and Cao Cao is not the hero? What are the configurations of the six countries? Is there a normal person against Ying Zheng? King Jian of Qi, a puppet emperor, was betrayed by the prime minister. King Chu knew how to kill nobles every day, which made the Chu country panic. Before Qin fought, a lot of people surrendered. Wang An of Han, he was stupid and self-righteous. King Xi of Yan, a king who thought that killing Ying Zheng would bring peace to the world. How ridiculous? The king of Wei pretended that everything would be safe if he surrendered. King Yan of Zhao and Li Mulianpo were all killed by him, so he asked these people, are they normal? Before the Ying Zheng in the Warring States Period, talented people gathered together. After the Ying Zheng, the mediocre people from the Six Kingdoms also gathered together. With this background, Ying Yi and Lu Buwei can also destroy the Six Kingdoms. Do you believe it?

Lao Zheng died early. If he lived a few more years, Qin would die in his lifetime.

This book is a bit exaggerated. Qin Shihuang unified the six countries, unified the system, built straight roads, and built the Great Wall. It was his contribution that cannot be erased. Without his unification, future generations may not have the concept of unity. At most, one powerful vassal state ruled many small vassal states like the Zhou Dynasty. But when it comes to other vassal states, there is nothing we can do about the Xiongnu. It is unrealistic how badly they were beaten. You must know that the Great Wall is not from 0 to 1 by the First Emperor. The Six Kingdoms have the Great Wall of the Six Kingdoms. The First Emperor just connected the Great Wall together. The strength of the Six Kingdoms is not weak. One or two countries may not be able to defeat the Xiongnu, but once the other six countries unite, they can definitely beat the shit out of the Xiongnu. And when other countries unite to fight against the Xiongnu, Qin cannot attack any of the six countries, otherwise it may be besieged. Moreover, most of the six countries are relatives, and it is impossible to watch other countries being destroyed by foreigners!

Those who say that Qin Shihuang is **, first take a look at the sentence "None of the feudal kings in the past surpassed Qin Shihuang." Then take a look at who said this.

Sz, my country's cultural unification was established in the Zhou Dynasty, with the distinction between Hua and Yi, and it was not Qin Shihuang who did the same thing. The writings of the Seven Heroes of the Warring States Period are about 90% the same. The system of prefectures and counties was not invented by Qin Shihuang. Qin Shihuang's greatest contribution was to extend the system of prefectures and counties throughout the country, but it also left disasters for the country's subjugation. The idea of ​​an emperor for eternity is even more of a joke. Take a look at the original article that first said that Qin Shihuang was an emperor for eternity: Qin Shihuang is naturally an emperor for eternity. Who is attached to the title of Hu Hai's book? If Hu Hai does not come, what will happen to the First Emperor?

"As a historical figure, Qin Shihuang should be commented in two parts. Qin Shihuang's progressive role in the process of historical development must be affirmed, but after unifying the six countries, he lost his enterprising aspect, became complacent, indulged in idle pleasures, begged gods, built palaces, and cruelly oppressed the people. It was very boring. Chen Sheng and Wu Guang opposed the tyranny of Qin, including opposing Qin Shihuang, which is completely just."

It's fun to read the comment section. It's better than the book. There are all kinds of black people. I don't understand what's the point of arguing. After reading a few books, I'll point out the country and criticize historical figures. I just want to ask, what qualifications do you have to criticize others? With your self-righteous modern eyes? How many history books have you read? Or did you personally experience other people's experiences of that era? Don't tell me that anyone can do better than them. Then have you ever thought that it's just your experience that predicts other people's experiences. You don't know anything about how you can do better than others? What's more, is the so-called history you read really true? With thousands of years of history, are you sure that all the history books you have read are true? Don't you think you're ridiculous when you're still commenting on that and this from a high position? Each dynasty has its own hardships and difficulties. The good and bad things done by those in power have become history. No matter how much you say, it can't change it. If you haven't experienced the suffering of others, don't criticize others, let alone make irresponsible remarks from the moral high ground.