The Fengshan Ceremony: Judging the Emperors' Merits and Sins

Another historical illiteracy. Just the fact that King Zhou rebelled against the divine power is stupid enough. Have you really read history? Have you really understood the dark nature of slave society and feudal society? Whether it was Qin Shihuang, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, or Tang Taizong and Ming Taizu, many of their achievements are very great achievements in our eyes. The actual purpose is to maintain the rule of imperial power. It is not the lofty reasons mentioned in the marketing account, nor is it such a lofty belief. Qin Shihuang never said anything about transforming into a dragon soul, nor did he give an order not to return to the frontier army. Don't read novels as history. While acknowledging and praising the achievements of the ancients, we must also face history. It is not as romantic and beautiful as you think!

The introduction alone is very unbelievable, the Ten Philosophers of the Internet Temple are even more classic, and the belittling of Li Shimin is also a classic. In the end, King Zhou, the first emperor of Zhaogu, Yang Guang, also brought in the famous civil war fantasy god Wu Zetian. It is really pure and unbelievable.

One of the major features of this type of book is that it suppresses King Zhou, wildly praises Qin Shihuang, belittles Li Shimin, and gives all the 400 achievements of the Han Dynasty to the Qin Dynasty and all the achievements of the Tang Dynasty to the Sui Dynasty.

Feilu has many books that have been re-released, and this one is probably in the same pattern. I have been reading books on Feilu for five or six years, and I have seen hundreds of books using this mode of operation. This situation has become commonplace. I have seen a book released on five or six platforms at the same time, and I couldn't laugh or cry!!! I used to complain about it, but now I am lazy and say that it may be a book republished by the original author. I have encountered this situation before. If you think it looks good, just read it. If it doesn't look good, just cut it off. You'll be at peace. It won't affect our lives anyway, so why bother!!!

If the history the author talks about is not the kind that has been changed by demons, then King Zhou is a fart wise king. At most, it can be said that he is not a fatuous king. But he could never get rid of the name of tyrant.

If you write about conferring gods, you can kneel down and lick Di Xin, because the routine of Internet articles about conferring gods is that Di Xin resists divine authority. If you want to write history, you still kneel down and lick Di Xin... Forget it, go back to junior high school and re-read it.

The so-called Qin Shihuang leaving troops to garrison the border is also quite interesting. Zhao Tuo, who was in Baiyue, directly led the army and proclaimed himself king, that is, the king of South Vietnam. Wang Ben led the army to return reinforcements and was defeated by Xiang Yu. This was because he was stationed at the border. The waves of self-reliance and reinforcements stationed at the border were defeated by others. Too six.

After seeing the introduction to King Zhou, Yang Guang already knew what the ingredients were. The first person to oppose theocracy and serve the country and the people, Yang Shengren, said that he used the emperor's six-dimensional analysis method. In fact, he only looked at the so-called achievements and ignored the cowardice.

No, buddy, now I can tolerate Shuangwen singing praises to Qin Shihuang, but you are going too far by bragging about King Zhou. Let me give you a suggestion. Isn't it more direct and better to read the next book "Ten Philosophers of the Online Temple"?

That's right, a dynasty that died in the second generation is still qualified to criticize Li Shimin. After all, our Shihuang always boasts about such a dynasty that basically has no local jurisdiction and still makes fun of others. A piece of trivia: Yingzheng was assassinated by Zhang Liang. The key is that Yingzheng was still unable to catch his assassin. This was the local control during the Yingzheng period. Moreover, Hu Hai only reigned for about three years. Among the dynasties that died in the Second World War, Liu Chan reigned for more than 40 years and Yang Guang reigned for about 13 years. Hu Hai reigned the shortest. In the 14th year of the Qin Dynasty, Hu Hai only reigned for three years. I don't know what he did to destroy the country so quickly. This must have nothing to do with Ying Zheng. After all, we, the First Emperor, would not think that this had anything to do with our Ying Zheng. Hu Hai did it all by himself. How could this have anything to do with our First Emperor? After all, we, the First Emperor, think that the Qin Dynasty will never be destroyed if the First Emperor does not die.