Great Qin: A World Comparison Leaves the Goddesses Drooling

You are simply evil. What did you write about Ying Zheng? I agree if you write it as a tyrant, but what you write is like a coward. This is an insult to Qin Shihuang. This is simply your personal prejudice against Qin Shihuang. Without the unification of Qin Shihuang, would there still be China as it is today? Would there still be unified writing? Will there still be the current unified weights and measures? Without the unification of Qin Shihuang, how many people would have died during the Warring States Period? And you have no evidence at all to prove that Qin Shihuang was a coward. Besides, did Qin Shihuang really cheat Confucianism? When he burned books, he burned them, but did he deceive Confucians? I admit that I have a bit of personal worship for Qin Shihuang, but we cannot look at the ancients with modern people's thinking. We have to look at the achievements he made at that time. In my opinion, Qin Shihuang is the only emperor through the ages. No emperor in Chinese history can compare with him. Sorry, I usually read books more seriously. If you think something is wrong, you can comment below. I can't possibly tell you to have the same opinion as me.

This is Black Yingzheng's, don't read it

It's good not to follow Ying Zheng, it's too much But why does Ying Zheng in the book look like a fool?

The author's book is okay. He is neither a son nor a younger brother. I am really tired of reading this kind of book. The only shortcoming is that Ying Zheng is too useless. Ying Zheng is tyrannical but not stupid. A man who can unify the world and unify weights and measures with the same track and the same text is definitely not stupid. He conquered Baiyue, built the Great Wall, built Afang, and built the imperial mausoleum. Too many people were lost.

Is what you are writing about Hei Yingzheng? If so, no one will read your book at all.

Just because the protagonist is not Ying Zheng's son after all is a major advantage.

To blackmail Yingzheng like this is really **! Ying Zheng can become the person who rules the world, just like that! Speechless Even if you don't mix with Ying Zheng, don't put the template of the faint king on him.

Read more, so as not to be criticized. Ying Zheng lived thousands of years ago and was a feudal landlord. He must have made great contributions to China, but he was indeed a tyrant. The life of ordinary people in his time was really not good. From the current perspective, it was not a life for human beings. As long as it's not hackable, is it necessary?

If the book is not good, Qin's destruction of the Six Kingdoms is inevitable, not accidental. The nobles of the Six Kingdoms have long been decadent, as long as the Qin State at that time was much better than the other six countries. Liu Bang was able to establish the Han Dynasty largely due to Qin Shihuang and Xiang Yu. The Han Dynasty was not established with the support of the nobles of the Six Kingdoms. It was only after a lot of donkeys and donkeys were slaughtered that things would be fine. Otherwise, it would be chaos like the early Han Dynasty. Han Dynasty NB, but Liu Bang couldn't do it, and neither did Xiang Yu. History is that when a country or dynasty decays and stops moving forward, it will perish, just like the Six Kingdoms at the end of Qin, the end of Han, the end of Tang, etc. Therefore, the destruction of the Six Kingdoms by Qin is inevitable, not like the author said, it can be this or that. To put it bluntly, the author still evaluates the ancients from the perspective of a modern person. His exposure to history is basically either watching anime or reading novels. The character of Qin Shihuang is not good at all. It is written in history books and played on TV.

It's understandable that everyone has different preferences and doesn't like Ying Zheng, but it's a bit brainless for you to write Ying Zheng like a fool!!!!