The Short Videos I Watch Travel to Ancient Times, Leaving the Ancients Dumbfounded

Zhu Yuanzhang is really not as good as Zhu Li

There is one emperor throughout the ages, but the history of civilization is not even 10,000 years old.

Zhu Yuanzhang was not as good as Chen Youliang in opposing the Yuan Dynasty. Chen Youliang spent his whole life opposing the Yuan Dynasty. Zhu Yuanzhang surrendered. It would be wrong to give all the credit for rebuilding China to Zhu Yuanzhang. Zhu Yuanzhang had merits and demerits. Now some people are deliberately exaggerating Zhu Yuanzhang's merits. First, he abolished the system of three provinces and six ministries. Second, he instituted the enfeoffment system. This is a regression of civilization. The backwardness of the Chinese nation to the West originated from Zhu Yuanzhang.

Strictly speaking, the author kind of licked Cixi and said there was nothing wrong with Li Shimin. After all, if Li Shimin hadn't given China's core technology to the Japanese, the Japanese wouldn't have been able to develop. If not for Li Shimin's Yuan Dynasty, Kublai Khan destroyed the Japanese. The techniques that Li Shimin sent to the Japanese include making iron swords, the prototype of the samurai sword is the Tang sword, and building city walls, etc.

It is wrong to say that the Ming Dynasty was just and Ming Dynasty. The Ming Dynasty's foreign wars basically failed to achieve their goals, including Zhu Di's sealing of Langjuxu and Chenghua's Liting sweeping holes. Why did they start the war? Just for fun? Just to show off your martial arts skills? No benefit was gained. The wars launched by the Ming Dynasty caused no substantial losses to foreign nations. In essence, the Ming Dynasty still emphasized civility over military affairs, and was extremely conservative. Why didn't Li Chengliang destroy the Qing Dynasty? Why did Yuan Chonghuan resell supplies to the Qing Dynasty?

Zhu Yuanzhang can at most be an emperor for eternity, but he is not qualified to be an emperor for eternity.

Western pseudo-historical theory reminds me of an old friend on a Tieba forum who said that the Book of the Later Han Dynasty was fake and was fabricated by some foreign-loving experts in the last century in order to please white people. Because Western history is all fabricated, neither Greece nor Rome existed, and there was no Roman Empire at all. Why do Chinese history books record a country that was fabricated by modern Westerners? Because the books of the Later Han Dynasty were also compiled by modern traitors. I just want to know what kind of brains are there that can come to this conclusion?

When will Cixi's old man die?

There shouldn't be much to say about the country, right? Otherwise, why is China so big?

Your butt decides, don't your brain understand?