I Build a Nuclear Fusion Reactor by Hand, and You Call It a Fireball Spell?

I'm done. Manual funny This book by the author has three major shortcomings, which are very serious. It is really difficult to stick to it even if there is no way to solve it. I am a junior high school Chinese teacher. First, the story has no backbone. The homework does not construct the subject's world view, and the reader looks at it in confusion. What is this story about?? Game cleared?? Secret room decryption? Doomsday survival? Or soaring in the daytime?? At least now, I don't see what the protagonist wants to do. From the beginning of awakening the profession to now becoming the King of Humans, everything has been so natural and smooth. Second, because there is no worldview structure, the content is empty. The main character is to fight monsters and upgrade skills. The author specifically wrote about the teams, villages, and regions. You don't have to think about how they will develop in the future. Occupations, skills, and equipment are all empty and have no connotation at all. Since it is a game, where is the role of occupations? Life skills have more functions than combat skills. Where's the copy? Where is Feilu? What about the task volume? Upgrading, equipment, basically looking at the boss, it's too simple. Readers have no interest in following the story because they have no expectations and no surprises in the story. Third, the author's writing skills are not strong. Character descriptions, emotional foreshadowing, and story content are repetitive and procrastinating. There is no focus, no thrilling, and gripping plot. There is no emotion that can be upsetting or tragic, and there are no unexpected or unexpected turning points. The whole article is a straightforward narrative in vernacular, about fighting monsters, upgrading, gaining skills, and indescribable things. I remember when I was studying, my favorites were Ghost Blowing the Lantern and Tomb Raider Notes. Because of its grand world view, complex background, and exciting detailed descriptions, the story outline, character descriptions, and psychological descriptions are all very penetrating. So after so many years, the content of the story and the descriptions of the characters are still fresh in my memory, and it is worth reading again and again. The author has a lot of room for improvement, but there are many problems that need to be paid attention to and solved. Come on

Does the author understand the concept of cool writing? The protagonist who cheats is no better than the one who doesn't cheat. So is your attempt in vain? He was full of enthusiasm and ambition one second, but was slapped in the face the next. Is this your favorite article? Before you bother writing a book, would you like to understand what Shuangwen is? If you don't know how to write a cool article, then you shouldn't use the title of the cool article, just occupying the manhole and not shitting? This is totally a scam.

I was speechless after reading the chapter about changing jobs. You are a cheater, even if you are a few days behind, you can't beat someone who is not cheating?

I don't know what the protagonist is pretending to be. Do you really think you can do it by opening a cheat? Do you still look down on people who eat and die? Does it mean that the rest of the people will get job transfer certificates by themselves, and then dozens more will die?

It makes me laugh so hard. No wonder the protagonist is not bitten by zombies. He has no brains.

Just read the book and enjoy it. What a pleasure. The superiority and particularity of the protagonist should always be pushed forward in a crushing manner, instead of being aggrieved for reasonable reasons. You are the author and there are ways to avoid it no matter how you write. It is too reasonable to just change jobs and use your brain. But isn't that a slap in the face of the protagonist? Slapping the protagonist in the face is slapping the reader in the face.

The author knows how to write nonsense. He likes to intersperse various memories and nonsense in one sentence. The plot that I could finish in one chapter has not yet been completed in four chapters.

There is a plot in the book where the protagonist asks his men to massacre people of his own country. It doesn't matter whether he is male, female, old or young. The protagonist goes from ordinary person to extraordinary in less than a year just to make readers feel happy. Does anyone feel comfortable after reading this section? However, what is the concept of massacring men, women, old and children? Or has the author thought about it?

Alas, I don't want to read it. I won't say that I have been in trouble ever since the concept of human king and human emperor appeared. I also changed the style from the original hegemony culture to the passionate and patriotic struggle story. It is not very enjoyable. If you had this style when you first appeared, I wouldn't have to worry about it and just leave.

There is no need to make the monster so strong just to limit the protagonist. . . It's no wonder that humans are still alive if they are so strong. If there is no protagonist, humans are so weak. Wouldn't they be extinct in a month?