Keeping a Diary in Fate Made Ryougi Shiki Blush

The editor framed me and I can't go on. Good, heart, emotion, wave, child. You are awesome!

Why is this book in another place missing?

I'm convinced. I've been keeping it for so long, and I just wanted to check it out today. I was wondering why I couldn't find it, but I didn't expect it to be blocked. I'm really convinced.

The whole world knows these settings of Nasu Mushroom's 25-year-old book, but you don't. He also said that the origin of the two rituals was not nothingness. What kind of thing can only a primary school student say? Have you read the book Sora no Kyoukai? This can be used as a leverage, so why are there always people in the world who want to show off their ignorance?

Is there any mention of root-style omniscience in the setting set? People only write omnipotence, omniscience and omnipotence are two different things. The King of Heroes' Noble Phantasm is an omniscient and omnipotent star. They specifically mark two things. What kind of self-righteous elementary school student is here to make up the root form and know everything? Not to mention reading the novels of The Realm of the Sky, the encyclopedia states that the origin of the two rituals is "empty", that is, nothingness. Who wouldn't search for it? I didn't read the book, and I didn't even search for it. I didn't know what fan I had read, so I just called it here. It's just that the brain is not developed properly, it's really funny! He also said that Shajo Aige is also omniscient and omnipotent, so the root style is the same~~! Damn it, are Shajo Aige and Gen Shita the same person? The worldviews are all different, and if Sajō Aika knows Age of Gods magic, can Gen Shiki know it? I haven't read a few books, but I keep shouting here. Is it okay to show off my ignorance?

Einzworth's replacement cannot be EX. Magician alone should not be able to reach this level.

Don't forget to save Sakura

This guy copied the original origin, but he used brackets instead of the concept of space. Is this guy blind? Still don't understand that empty brackets refer to nothingness? That proves that you haven't read the original work at all! The concept of empty brackets is explained clearly in the original book. You haven't even read it yet, so you just read a few settings you don't understand and think you understand? How foolish! Anyone who has ever seen a smart person won't be like this, right?

I checked, it was 48 10 minutes ago, and it was 80 when I came back 10 minutes later, outrageous

This is the official one. I copied it. Can you see where it says there is an origin and there is nothingness?