Examining Historical Misconceptions, Starting with Armchair Strategy

Winners write history, losers create history, haha

Zhao Kuo really had no choice, but the real reason seemed to be that he was too eager for quick success and led his troops to get dumped. However, Bai Qi's military exploits were real.

Don't just think of the ancient myths. The most typical one is the First Emperor. In the eyes of some people, Qin Shihuang feels like he is no longer a human being. He is a god in the sky. There is no mistake. The white lotus is omnipotent. It makes me have a kind of rebellious mentality now. Whenever I see the First Emperor in historical novels, I don't want to read them.

Not bad, is it the video of Bohai's little official?

Yes, history is not what the history books say. Historiographers have more or less subjective emotions, and subsequent dynasties will slander the previous dynasty, so history books must reflect the objective factors at that time.

Historical disparity is a must.

It was purely because of intelligence issues. It turned out that the general who attacked Lian Po was not the one, and then he was replaced by Bai Qi. He was almost a full-level boss at the time. Let's put it this way. You say he is useless, but have you ever thought about him? Even his father said that his father was also a top boss at the time. Have you ever thought about it that his father never said on paper that he had proven his ability to use troops, but he did not think about some factors and was eager to succeed, which led to his failure.