Listing the Foolish Emperors Leaves the Founding Ancestors in Despair!

There are several potentially controversial monarchs: 1. Yang Guang. This guy is almost praised as the emperor of the ages by various rhythm masters. In fact, at most the merits and demerits are equal to each other. He is not as bad as Li Tang smeared him, and he is definitely not worthy of the emperor of the ages. 2. Zhao Gou. There is no doubt that he is an absolute fool, but he is not as unbearable as what you wrote in your article. Historically, Zhao Gou was very modest and cautious. He was raised in Hangzhou by the Jiangnan nobles and was treated as a pawn of the Jiangnan peace faction, the northern war faction, and the northern surrender faction. In this environment, he cannot be an arrogant person. Instead, Zhao Gou spends most of his time acting badly and never considers state affairs. You can fight as you like, and I will write an imperial edict to whoever wins. 3. Zhao Guangyi. This is a hidden and foolish emperor. Let's not talk about whether he was in the right position or not. His brother only emphasized literature and suppressed military power. He had no bottom line to please civilian officials. He was responsible for redundant officials. He was the pioneer of civilian officials commanding the army to fight. He was the one who gave the gentry exemption from prison sentences and taxes. The second emperor caused a peasant uprising.

Although Qianlong was a foreign emperor, his personal abilities and achievements were not among the top ten faint emperors. This man had a high upper limit and a low lower limit. He had been in power for sixty years and his brain was no longer clear-headed at his age. Within the Qing Dynasty, he was ranked among the top five emperors. The one who was better than him was Kangxi. Huang Taiji was strong in both domestic affairs and military affairs. His father was stronger than him in domestic affairs but weaker than him in military affairs. Lao Nu was the best in military affairs in the Qing Dynasty, but not as good in internal affairs. The remaining Qing emperors were not as good as him in everything. Qianlong was a coward, and the remaining Qing emperors were all cowards. Although the Qing Dynasty was humiliated in the later period, it was not bad in the early stage. In the Ming Dynasty, Hongwu and Yongle surpassed Qianlong, and Hongxi and Xuande were about the same. These two reigned for a short period of time, one was ten months, the other ten years. Chenghua, Hongzhi, and Jingtai were all inferior. Zhengde had martial virtue, but internal affairs were not as good, and Zhu Jingmen, Zhu Carpenter, and old Taoist priests were even worse. Zhao Kuangyin in the Song Dynasty was stronger than Qianlong, but others were not as good as Qianlong. In the Tang Dynasty, Taizong and Gaozong were more powerful than him. Xuanzong was stronger than him in the early stage but not as good in the later stage. Wu Zetian was about the same. Not as good as the rest. The Qin and Han Dynasties were stronger than the First Emperor, Emperor Gaozu, Emperor Wen, Emperor Wu, Emperor Xuan, Emperor Guangwu, and Emperor Ming. Emperor Zhang and Emperor Jing were evenly matched, Emperor Hui was matched with Empress Lu, Emperor Zhao was matched with Huo Guang, and the rest were inferior.

Zhu Di is stupid, author, if you don't want your brain, you can donate your brain. Don't insult history here. After all, his name will last forever, what can you do? Besides writing bad things about people in this novel, what else can you do? I have seen shameless people, but I have never seen such shamelessness as you. The author's face has been completely lost by you. No one will remember you after your death.

Xiang Yu is a murderous maniac. He has made many achievements. The first person to seize the city has since then started to fight wars in later generations. It is not an exaggeration to say that he is a destroyer of civilization.

To be honest, I have always felt that some people in the historical area insist on promoting certain emperors, and even make it so messy that they make some emperors look amazing, especially Qin Shihuang, md, is this your father? He boasts like a god and makes us feel embarrassed if we don't kneel down. He has made great achievements in history, but you can't ignore his waste of people and money, nor his tyranny. Zhu Yuanzhang came from a humble background, so don't really think that he was good to the people. They were just historical figures, not religious leaders. History is about pursuing justice, and it is not worthy of modern people's respect even if it is powerful.

How to put it, history has been established, and I don't think Zhu Biao can do better than Zhu Di when he succeeds to the throne. Zhu Qizhen is indeed not a thing, but at least three generations of Zhu Di and his grandson have lived through two prosperous times. The rule of Renxuan can be regarded as the pinnacle of the Ming Dynasty's national power. Who can guarantee that after Zhu Biao or Zhu Gaoxu comes to power, the three generations of the family can do better than Zhu Di, Zhu Gaochi, and Zhu Zhanji? There are no guarantees. Moreover, maybe Zhu Di, Zhu Gaochi, and Zhu Zhanji were too outstanding in the Zhu family lineage, and they exhausted their luck, and their prosperity must decline, so Zhu Qizhen was born to balance it out. After all, Wang Mang was so defiant before, didn't he also have a great magician come out to balance and repair it?

There will be foolish kings in later generations, and it is outrageous that the retribution will be meted out to the founding ancestors. According to traditional thinking, shouldn't it be the other way around? And the author obviously later found out that the setting was unreasonable, so he didn't have to retaliate a few times. He directly invalidated the setting himself. He could directly choose not to let the ancestors bear the responsibility, and he could even choose to let the descendants accept the punishment. So why did you set it up in the first place? It would be better to set it up from the beginning so that after taking stock of the unlucky king, the ancestors would choose different punishments to be directly applied to the descendants of the unlucky king, which would be more interesting. And with a slight change of form, the emperors of the past dynasties can even vote to choose the punishment, or even all the people in the current generation of the emperor can vote to choose the punishment. If set like this, the plot can have more highlights.

Even if he doesn't need to be killed, I believe he cares about the people.

The author is from the Southern Song Dynasty. Except for Xiaozong of Song Dynasty, no wise emperor was a faint king. You can also mention it. Anyway, I look down on two dynasties. One is Sima Yi's Jin Dynasty, and the other is Zhao Kuangyin's Song Dynasty. In the 21st century, not many people look down on the Song Dynasty and Jin Dynasty, right?

It seems that I laughed at every other review. If nothing else, I punished him this way instead of punishing the foolish emperor. Instead, I went to the source and punished the founding emperor. He let the founding emperor choose to punish himself or the people of his era. Why is it so funny?