Reborn in 1993, I Became Liu Tianxian’s Godfather

Reading a book is not to popularize science for you. It can be said that if it is not changed in the future, this book will be forgotten. There is no content to popularize science. Reading is to read the plot, not to popularize science for you. Do you know as much as Fei Lu? You don't need to learn about other people's experiences. If it doesn't change in the future, you can only *.

I've given all the flower review votes, why don't I add more soon?

It's basically full of popular science words, with very few plot lines. What do you think?

You can't lose your feelings, you can't forget Sister Li, you know, hehe

Don't break your promise, I will always support you

It's not popular science, but someone else is telling you how you did it? Some people in the science popularization forum dislike too much science popularization and it is hard to agree with others. Just write according to your own ideas. Don't update too often. It's very uncomfortable.

I want you to do it intermittently, otherwise you would have started writing this book a long time ago. What you wrote is quite good.

You came riding on colorful auspicious clouds. I'm really looking forward to your update! I'll read it when it's updated. I've read it!

What you wrote is quite good. The data is rigorous and the logic makes sense. It's just a little lacking. Otherwise, the results would be very good.

Are you still insisting on writing? The evaluation votes are full, so I can't vote.