Enough with the Romance of the Three Kingdoms: From the Start, Ranking History's Ten Greatest Generals
别演义了：开局盘点史上十大猛将
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 2.0M Words
- Genre
- Military & History
- Subgenre
- Time Travel
- Updated
- 3y ago
- Source
- Faloo
Synopsis
All-time: Reads, Flowers.
1.1kChapters
1.5MReads
4.3kFlowers
9.8Score
More by this author
Readers also read
Honghuang: I Just Became a Primordial Great Overlord and Founded a Chat Group
You Asked Me to Build an Aircraft Carrier, So What Are These Ship Girls?
Ranking the Ten Greatest Battles of the Ming Dynasty: Zhu Yuanzhang Loses It
Ranking the Top Ten Web Novel Authors: Protagonists Across the Worlds Are Stunned
I Developed a Sailing Game, and the Whole World Went Wild!
I Became a Korean Chaebol, and Started Taking Girls' Generation by Storm from the Start!
Reader comments 50
Translated by Google Translate
Brother, you said you are talking about history, not interpretation, but Guan Yu. Officially, Guan Yu is just a bird. Luo Guanzhong's Romance of the Three Kingdoms deified the Three Kingdoms as ordinary people. Hua Xiong was killed by Sun Jian, and it was Lu Su who went alone with his sword. There is no such thing as killing six generals through five passes, Zhao Yun He is just a young general. Zhuge Liang is only good at politics. Although the others are not bad, they are not top-notch. The Five Tiger Generals are just a joke. There is no such thing in the official history. Yan Yi is Yan Yi, and history is history. Don't show one thing and do another behind the scenes. You are just a fool.
The Romance of the Three Kingdoms has high literary value and is one of the four great classics. Unfortunately, it has shortcomings. It distorts history, causing some people to ignore the official history and the romance. They spread fake history everywhere on the Internet and mislead young people. What is the difference between this and the West using Homer's epics and the Bible as history? Using romance as history is simply an insult to our ancestors.
In the official history, Guan Yu cannot compare with Xue Rengui, Xu Da, Chang Shiwan and others in terms of military force and military command. You don't even have Yang Zaixing, one of the few real enemies with a hundred people in history. That's not a novel, it's real.
It's not that you don't regard romance as history. Where did your Qinglong Yanyue Sword come from?
This introduction is a bit interesting. While complaining about the novel, Guan Yu rewards the Qinglong Yanyue Sword.
After reading the introduction and ranking Guan Yu... I instantly felt that there was no need to read this book... Another one who treats romance as history...
. . . While saying that others were using novels, I ended up being the same as myself...
Didn't you say it's not a romance? Then is Li Yuanba a character in the romance?
There is no such person as Li Yuanba in the official history, there is only Li Xuanba, who died at the age of 16
After checking the Three Kingdoms, there is only one place where it says about taking the enemy's head out of ten thousand armies. It is different from the ability to command troops, fierce generals and commanders. China has a long history, and Guan Yu needs to be a strong general in the Three Kingdoms. But if we look at the entire history, it cannot be counted. Weizhen Huaxia was at that time. Guan Yu's greatest fame comes from romance novels. He was very good, but in 2016, he would not have been in the top ten. Fierce generals, talk about force. Don't be famous, be honorary.