Great Qin: My Multiple Personalities Were Simulated by the First Emperor
大秦：多重人格的我被祖龙模拟了
Synopsis
All-time: Reads, Flowers.
260Chapters
2.2MReads
90.9kFlowers
10.0Score
Readers also read
Global Class Change: Why Is the Healer So Popular?
Great Ming: Zhu Di Simulates and Exposes My Multiple Personalities
Great Ming: Making Zhu Yuanzhang Choose Why the Ming Dynasty Falls from the Start
I Wrote a Guide to National Fate in Advance, and My Daughter Exposed It
Gourmet: Starting from the Start, Taking a Girl to the Baron Islands
You Asked Me to Film a Health Insurance PSA, and I Made the Whole Internet Cry?
Reader comments 50
Translated by Google Translate
There is nothing wrong with founding a country in the way of legal hegemony, but there are problems if you want to govern the country. It will cause the problem of too strict laws, and the problem of labor is also very serious. More than three million people in the world are mobilized to do labor, but how many people are left to farm? After all kinds of problems, will the people be convinced? No, they will rebel. Everyone in the world has rebelled. Let alone Qin Shihuang, even a bunch of emperors who have lived through the ages cannot defeat him. And this problem has been verified by many kings. Isn't Emperor Yang of Sui an example? I feel that Fei Lu just gave him a myth. In fact, Qin Shihuang cannot be called an emperor through the ages. He can only be said to be a wise king who founded the country and a faint king who helped the world.
Is this necessary? It feels like you are still building a brand when you are a bz, so what if you show ambition? In ancient times, as long as you ran fast, you could be killed? And because you rebelled in the simulation, the emperor will attack you in reality. This is based on your inability. Anyway, I think you are going out of your way to highlight the protagonist's passive rebellion against the old **
The saddest thing about Ying Zheng is that his mother Zhao Ji is here. There is a saying that My mother, she wanted a lover, not me.
He is both a great master and a master of martial arts. I am really speechless. When writing history, write history properly. It is really awkward to see things that do not exist in real history. Are you talking about an imaginary world? You can't write history as well as others. You just need someone who can carry the cauldron. You have to be a great master and master of martial arts. It's really difficult to read history. It's weird.
I have seen too many authors ask if there is anyone, and if there is someone, they will update twenty. They are deceived time and time again, and it is all fake. The author does not even know if there is a manuscript in the archive, so there is no need to say such things. You update normally, and we can read it normally.
Piece everything together. Cut it.
The first one is by Ming Dynasty Lao Zhu, and I also saw Cao Cao's
I hope Lu Pheasant can be properly arranged. It's not worth following Liu Bang.
It's really frustrating to watch. The six major personalities are all top figures. The pig's foot is a wandering wild crane. There is no progress, and he never became emperor once in the Qin Shihuang simulation. Even if it's inappropriate, you still have to have some resistance. Are you still a man without soldiers?
. . . . Can you call a strong man who can lift something weighing five hundred kilograms?? Were they so cruel in ancient times?