The Most Deceptive Lawyer: a Fine of Two Million Was Commuted to a Sentence of 20 Years

I didn't want to complain, but I just couldn't help it. In the first case, the plaintiff Liu Yubing was dressed casually for hundreds of thousands of dollars, so the plaintiff was worth at least hundreds of millions, or even billions. In a family with a net worth of over 100 million or even billions, the younger sister went to work-study, and the daughter of a big family went to experience life? In addition, if you are worth more than 100 million or even billions, you only want to compensate the defendant gangster 2 million, instead of thinking about taking revenge directly. Even if you don't pay to kill them, you can find some connections and directly put the defendant in jail. It is easy to get a sentence of twenty years or even life. Is this reasonable? Anyway, if someone severely injures my brother or sister, and I don't lack medical expenses, I will never ask for monetary compensation, but retaliate with tooth for tooth and blood for blood.

There is such a lawyer in reality. Even if I don't approve of him, I still respect him as a man.

If you harm your own customers because of your own subjectivity, how could anyone still come to you?

This is no longer a question of good writing or bad writing. This is completely insulting the reader's intelligence. Are you sure that this kind of lawyer can take the case? Who the hell dares to find a lawyer who will backstab him? The person who dares to find him probably has no brains. If you don't find this kind of traitor, who will die?

As a lawyer, you must have your own professional ethics. Since you accept an order, you must have your own principles. You cannot make inferences about a person based on your own subjective assumptions. Lawyers are the least emotional. When you receive an order, you must do it well, no matter whether the matter itself is good or bad. Otherwise, as a lawyer, your reputation will be ruined in the entire legal circle! ! ! If all lawyers were emotional, the number of unjust, false and wrongful cases in our country would increase at least a hundred times. Who can withstand this? ? ? As a typical person who does things for money, at least his professional ethics are affirmative, otherwise he would not be able to hang out in that circle, even if he burns CDs! ! !

But whether it is a novel or reality, it must comply with objective laws. Those who read novels without thinking are still thinking that they are the mainstream of Feilu despite their small V. . . Awkward?

If it involves a criminal case, there must be a criminal lawsuit first, and then a civil lawsuit. You said here that the defendant did not have any criminal penalties at all, only compensation, and that was a pure civil lawsuit. As a result, in the middle of the trial of the civil lawsuit, a criminal penalty was suddenly announced, and the court was adjourned inexplicably. There was no reason. You also said that he applied for recusal. This is the first time I heard that the litigant applied for himself. If you avoid it, okay, let's just treat it as if the judge allowed him to run out to investigate and collect evidence during the debate stage, so let's rest. But the defendant hasn't come back yet, and he hasn't made his final statement, so the judge just announced the verdict. It's really brainless. If you really find new evidence that proves it is a criminal case, then you should rule to suspend the prosecution. What's funny is that he will be sentenced to twenty years in prison. Generally, the maximum for intentional injury and serious injury is ten years. You 6

I, **********, really only know how to fart a series of spiced spicy farts. I don't know some basic information, so I just leave Xia Jiba to write randomly. Those who support the author don't know how old they are. If you don't help the client, you can't even think of staying in the lawyer circle. Also, if you can't even distinguish between civil and criminal matters, you'll just get it wrong. Fei Lu is written by people like this, no wonder it's getting worse. If I don't ask you to know the basic situation, just let Xia Jiba write about it. I am really *********

I haven't read the book, but the situation of changing my client's fine from two million to twenty years has happened three times against my will. After all, no one is a fool. If you can win, it shows that you are capable, but if you cheat your employer, it means that there is a certain risk in bringing a lawsuit against you. If you are a messenger of justice, Or, then those with evil intentions will not appear in your client list, but if you are just used to cheating employers, then you will never receive the third case. Except for those ill-informed fools who will come to use you as material to write books, you can only change careers.

I only believe in one sentence: If you want to be a lawyer to uphold the justice in your heart, then leave as soon as possible. There are unjust cases even when the evidence is solid. For the sake of self-righteous justice, it is ridiculous