He Ate My Takeaway and Made Me Cry. Do You Want Me to Claim Compensation?

In fact, if that guy said, "I want to eat spicy food, how do I know your child will eat it?" That guy would have nothing wrong with him, but the problem is that the person said too much that the takeaway was to get revenge on the child, thus turning the victim into a perpetrator.

Are netizens really so slutty?

Exaggerate things. If it's a novel, just write a novel. Don't be kidnapped by morality at every turn. It's not so serious now. Many people already understand it. It's not that era anymore.

You have to be Feilu, keep up with current events

The writing is not good, the plot is too contrived, bad review

It's so bland, I didn't feel anything after reading it.

Someone has already confirmed that the content in the video is all edited and patched together, and the patchwork of content is edited by families who have lost their children. It can be said that those self-media are really ** for the sake of traffic. . As for eating takeout secretly, it is most likely fake news. . Real video I just got this morning. .

The pacing is not good, the writing is not good, the plot is awkward, and I have no desire to read any more.

In Tan Yunyun's lawsuit, the opponent's lawyer was too good. In the whole case, the protagonist only had two pieces of evidence to accuse the lawyer. One was a recording and the other was money entering the account. First of all, the recording itself cannot be used as evidence. Secondly, who doesn't need to spend money to hire a lawyer when filing a lawsuit? It should be normal for a lawyer's account to have money from his employer, right? The witness's money was paid by someone else, and the presiding judge's money was paid by the client's mother. So if the lawyer defends Mao **, not to mention winning the entire lawsuit, at least he can protect himself.

Escanor's strongest point is when his soul is burning. In that state, he can defeat the Demon King.