Villain: The Reborn Heroine Dreams of Starting Over

After rebirth, the male protagonist directly begins to take revenge on the female protagonist, and the plot has not even started yet. The protagonist starts directly based on what happened in the previous life. It's like you know that he will be sorry for you and harm you in the future, so it is natural for you to kill him? Is this an inference of guilt? Revenge for something that hasn't happened yet is not legitimate, right? Since the protagonist after rebirth has already said that he can do whatever he wants, then these people in the previous life are just passers-by. There is no need to live in the past in a new life, right? In order to retaliate for something that hasn't happened yet, is this any different from the previous life when you messed with your female protagonist and your male protagonist for no apparent reason? Or is it that the slain dragon was reborn as a brave man and then started the journey of slaying dragons? Ahem, the above content is my own opinion, don't comment if you don't like it, it's just a novel.

Wasn't it just acting from the beginning? There is a saying: "The actors are crazy, the people watching the show are crazy." After the show ended, no one knew anyone. If you don't act well and adjust your mentality, it's just another shot. In other books, it's just pure acting. You know you don't belong here. You can do whatever you want outside of the plot. If you see someone you want to help, I'll give you a try. The worst is the worst. This book is too deep into the drama and ends up like a machine. It doesn't do any in-depth investigation. It just believes in past life experiences. Isn't it assumed that the female protagonist was deceived by the original male protagonist and then turned against the protagonist?

It's obviously supposed to be a cool article, why do I feel uncomfortable reading it? After summarizing, I discovered that this book has a huge shortcoming, that is, the author set the female protagonists to have regrets in the past life, and found out that they loved the protagonist. After rebirth, they began to think of ways to make up for it. To be honest, if you want to kill the female protagonist, you don't need to set it like this. Why not let them continue to insult the protagonist with their ugly faces? In that case, I feel good about the protagonist killing them, but now you have to tell the readers what the heroine will do for the protagonist after rebirth. For example, the protagonist's sister, you set her to like the protagonist in the previous life, but she followed others to insult the protagonist in order to attract the protagonist's attention. After rebirth, she could even be herself for the protagonist, but the protagonist directly killed her with a gun. She was feeling guilty when she died. You have cleared the heroine yourself. Why kill her if you want to clear her name?

I'm a little confused about that. The protagonist originally traveled through time, right? He has been following the script given by the system, so in the eyes of others, he is a stubborn young man. It is normal for the heroine to dislike him and dislike him, right? It's impossible for you to be capable, but if you don't show it and just wait to die, others will like you, right? No matter how capable a beggar on the roadside is, he looks so slovenly. Will you think he is very powerful, will you like him, and get close to him? Moreover, acting according to the script, that is to say, he already knows what the protagonist does and how the heroine reacts. It is just a scene. Once it is performed, it is over. They are all just acting for the occasion. Who is cleaner than who?

I would still admire you if you could kill them all, but it's a pity that after you kill one, there's a limit to what's left.

My favorite thing about villain reincarnation stories is that the heroine tried so hard to humiliate and torture the protagonist, and ruined the protagonist's family, but she was told that she loved the protagonist, and then she came clean. After the heroine was reborn, the heroine gave her some color, and the protagonist stuck to her. Even if the protagonist is a good actor, there is no big hatred, so you should stay away from it. What's more, in some stories, the protagonist is sincerely devoted to his feelings, which is even more awesome. I have read a book where the protagonist is reincarnated for a hundred lifetimes, and the heroine will be reincarnated for every generation. It was extremely miserable (the heroine in the book also had memory reincarnation), and the protagonist also resisted and gave sincerity. In the last life of the protagonist, the heroine took a liking to her, and the protagonist joined her and made all previous efforts in vain. Moreover, after the original hero succeeded, he suppressed the heroine's family and tortured the heroine's family to death. The heroine had memories of reincarnation and helped the original hero for ninety-nine lives. It was not until the last life that she decided to help the protagonist, and she said it was because she loved the protagonist to clear her name.

Why can't you kill first and then kill after playing for a while?

Personally, I think it's a bit advantageous for the protagonist to get rid of the heroine like this? It would be better for the protagonist to torture the heroine to the point of death, and in the end the heroine begs the protagonist to give her a break. Since the protagonist is almost going crazy after being tortured by the heroine, why not the author simply writes the protagonist as a lunatic with mental problems, slowly tortures the heroine, and lets them try what it feels like to be tortured into a lunatic.

In fact, the protagonist is a clown, and the system that brought him here is the one who deserves to be killed.

Kill quickly, kill quickly! Everyone came to see the decisive killing