Playing the Criminal: Designing the Perfect Accident from the Start

I don't know why when I see the protagonist smiling evilly now, this book has a direct impact on my heart. I am really speechless. Can't I think of laughing? Or do you just smile evilly when you think of smiling?

Is it really not possible to come directly? That's much hotter than this

I think there shouldn't be a female protagonist in this kind of novel. If there is a female protagonist, it would be a major failure of the novel.

The system capability is big data, allowing you to know information on various networks. But it doesn't mean that you can cause a car accident just by stretching your legs. There are too many unstable factors. It should be possible to add a super power prediction/deduction or something like that.

This world view setting means that the moment he directly shoots to damage the image of the people's police, he is no longer a policeman. The moment he points the gun at civilians, he commits a crime. It is really messy.

I read the first case, and it was really ridiculously written. It was purely made up of a bunch of unrelated things and made up into one case to make the protagonist look awesome. I didn't think it would work if there was some logic.

It's this kind of big hole you dig. If it doesn't come round later, use an outline to write it.

A lot of things don't make sense, they don't make sense, they're all brainless.

If you don't write about some real spies, the spies will show that you are patriotic, right? This is the worst thing about labor and management.

Commentary on the chapter "Playing the Crime: The Perfect Accident of the Opening Design" written by George Taotao. Chapter 1: Playing the Crime, Binding the System.