Nationwide Investing: Pick Me and You'll Win Big

After killing thousands of people, I immediately continued to listen to the lectures and go to school. You, the author, are really awesome.

In addition to the adventurous nature of the first investment, Pigfoot has become a tool man later on.

If a player dies once in the game, the investor's losses will double. Resurrection requires ten days of life.

There is no problem with investing, but the key is that those who invest will get what they invest. What? I think you can change it. The life spent on resurrecting the investee belongs to the investor. Resurrection once costs the investor a minimum of 10 days of life (calculated based on the investor's investment time)

Attribute points are too easy to get, and I feel like they are going to collapse.

Those with luck of more than 100,000 yuan can still be injured, while those with less than 100,000 yuan will suddenly die suddenly.

You should write that they invest lifespan in exchange for points, and then the points can be exchanged for some equipment and items for players. But like you, the people who invested get nothing at all, and they still have to give back to those who invested in it. This is not fair at all! It should be that they use lifespan in exchange for points, and I buy equipment for others. This is fair. Otherwise, it would be too cheating. Of course, you cannot exchange a fraction of it for strength. Otherwise, if everyone gives points to one person, then one person will be invincible. You can buy them equipment or resurrection coins, but if you invest nothing and they can't use it, it's so cheating! I give money to others in exchange for life. Like you, others don't even know what you can get if they hold you back. Is it useful?

It should be called gambling. You have to ask me why I say that? You idiot, the people being invested get nothing, and those who invest will suffer losses. If they invest well, they will lose money if they invest poorly. After all, your so-called investment is of no help to investors at all. For the person being invested, even if you invest tens of millions or hundreds of millions, it won't help him at all. Then I want to say, is it useful for you? You might as well just write it as gambling from the beginning. How come the investor didn't get anything? The same investor as Erdan did not pay anything. In other words, what he earned was all his own. If it is really the relationship between investment and being invested, then after the investee makes a lot of money, he should give feedback to some people who invested in him. But obviously, this is not necessary. The one who makes money here will be himself by then. If he does not make money, it will be his own. Your investment will be useless if others invest in him, and it will be useless if he does not invest.

About Chapter 77 of "National Investment: Choose Mine and Win All" written by Feng Xiaoxiaoyu. Become a Superman? Chapter review.

There is no need to watch until the end of training