Great Qin's National Destiny: I'm the Only One Who Chose to Be the First Emperor's Son!

Why do I think you wrote about the emperor of the Song Dynasty? What about the domineering power of the First Emperor? How majestic the First Emperor was, even a eunuch and a servant could continuously refute and interrupt. Are you sure this is the First Emperor of Qin? Not a softie? Don't watch anymore, I'm convinced

Nowadays, novels often talk about Liu Bang as a villain, and it is Xiang Yu who kills Liu Bang and destroys Qin. It is also Xiang Yu who digs up the tomb of the Qin Emperor.

The Qin Code has great integrity, and also reflects the advanced concept of the Qin Dynasty's legal system. It's a pity that history is written by the victors after all. In addition, Confucianism later became dominant, which brought the Qin Dynasty to the sky.

Author, your image of the First Emperor is too bad. With the power of the First Emperor, how could Zhao Gao have the courage to interfere with the First Emperor's decision again and again??? Still have an opinion??? Do you think the First Emperor would explain the decisions he made to others???

Although the merits of continuously purging Qin Shihuang outweigh the faults, tyrants are not born from b.

Haha, so funny. The author thinks that if Hu Hai did not succeed to the throne, Zhao Gao did not usurp the imperial edict, and Fu Su ascended the throne, the Qin Dynasty would not be destroyed? To tell you the truth, if Fusu succeeds to the throne, the Qin Dynasty will only fall faster, even worse than the Eastern Zhou Dynasty.

Another person who boasts about Qin Shihuang, a survivor of the Sixth Dynasty. At that time, he could unify the Qin Dynasty even if he changed the position. Now some people would not think that the Qin Dynasty was conquered by Qin Shihuang alone, and attribute all the achievements of the unification to Qin Shihuang. His grandfather, King Qin Zhaoxiang, scorned Qin Shihuang for his contribution to the Qin Dynasty, and Qin Shihuang There were already uprisings when the First Emperor was in power, and war broke out across the country less than three months after his death. He would not have thought that Hu Hai had such great ability to overthrow the Qin State in three months. If Qin Shihuang had not died, he would have been the king of subjugation. The author also criticized Liu Bang. Without Liu Bang, who established the unified Han Dynasty for more than 400 years, Qin Shihuang's achievements were nothing.

Can you please stop making this audience look so retarded? U is just like **

Why do some people always blame Qin Shihuang for the faults of Hu Hai and Zhao Gao? History has pinned the fault of Hu Hai and Zhao Gao on Qin Shi Huang, but we modern people still like to pin the fault of Hu Hai and Zhao Gao on Qin Shi Huang. We know clearly that it was Hu Hai and Zhao Gao who lost the country, but they seem to have habitually ignored Zhao Gao and Hu Hai, saying After all, all the eighteen sons of Zulong were useless, otherwise the Qin Dynasty would have been a dynasty with a legacy longer than that of the Zhou Dynasty. After hundreds of years of Spring and Autumn and Warring States, Qin had survived. Who would have thought that the country would be ruined just because Qin Shihuang did not have a good heir? It can be seen from the history of the Qin Dynasty that the Qin Dynasty did not have a good successor selection system, which led to the fall of imperial power several times. Since there was no fiefdom, the Ying clan had no power, and neither the clan nor relatives could check and balance Zhao Gao. The Qin Dynasty was completely defeated.

You are smarter than them, right? If Liu Bang couldn't do it, why would these talents follow him? I don't know where all the keyboard warriors came from to criticize Liu Bang. If you have bad personal ethics, you are not worthy of being a hero, right? Look at the emperors in the past who did not have a bad history? Can a good person be an emperor?