History Recut: A Top Ten Ranking of History's Most Shameless Emperors from the Start

Read more official history. Wu Zetian is ranked among the best in the world. She specially opened anonymous examinations, palace examinations, and re-employed poor families. That is what you can slander. No one from poor families scolded her. The point of view is darker than novels. Compared with Li Shiming, he is a practical person. Li Shimin is not a good person in history.

Is the comment section really the top ten philosophers in the world? Can Emperor Sui Yang dethrone the Sui Empire at its peak and still boast of Mingjun? Wu Zetian had such a ridiculous achievement? There is not enough copper and iron in Wudetianqu to be melted with common people's hoes, which leads to a shortage of copper and iron in the world. Otherwise, why do you think it was melted later? The imperial examination system was initiated by Emperor Wen of the Sui Dynasty. However, the imperial examination in the Sui Dynasty was the imperial examination system, which was perfected by Taizong. It is nonsense to say that the common people's aristocratic families weakened the aristocratic families in the three expeditions to Goguryeo. There are also grain fields in the Sui Dynasty. What do you think of 2 billion acres? Do you know how many acres China has now? It is said that the Tang Dynasty inherited the luck of the Sui Dynasty, didn't the Sui Dynasty also inherit the luck of the Zhou Dynasty? I can understand why you are bragging about Emperor Wen. Emperor Sui Yang defeated the Sui Empire at its peak and lost more than half of its population. Why are you bragging? How much territory did Wu Zetian lose during her reign? Don't look for those maps on the Internet. It's outrageous that they can include the post-Turkish territories that pretended to surrender. I don't understand. Taizong defeated the Turks and crippled Goguryeo.

No matter how the top three are ranked, they must be the First Emperor, Zhu Yuanzhang, and Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty. The others are not worthy.

Comment: Is it okay to clean up Emperor Sui and Ming? The prosperous Sui Dynasty could be directly bullied to the end of the country. He was really a good emperor. We only talk about his great achievements, but don't see his cruelty? It was clear that the construction period could be extended, but he was so happy that he had to do it quickly, so many people died. The ancestors died, and the descendants enjoy the shade?

After Confucianism gained power, even the First Emperor became a crow. Liu Bang hated Confucianism, so he became a buffoon. Do you believe that Lang Mie was killed among so many heroes? The same goes for Li Yuan! The most egregious one was King Zhou. Because Wei Ziqi was an ancestor of Confucius (he went to Zhou Tong to report that King Zhou had left an army to return to the capital alone, which led to the destruction of his own dynasty, and he knelt down to beg for his life) and was forcibly charged.

In the Tang Dynasty, what are you trying to say? Why did the Tang Dynasty dare to change history and not let them criticize you? I think the worst were the barbarians of the Song and Tang dynasties.

Can you please stop writing Liu Bang's merits outweigh his faults, Yang Guang's merits outweigh his faults, and Wu Zetian's merits outweigh her faults. Why do you think Wu Zetian and Yang Guang are incompetent? Wu Zetian couldn't defeat the Turks at that time, right? Otherwise I would have been hammered to death. Can you read the history books carefully before writing a novel?

1. The Xuanwu Gate Incident 2. The prosperous age of Zhenguan 3. Send envoys to Tang Dynasty The most annoying thing is the third thing Li Shimin did. He gave Japan the research results that his ancestors spent countless efforts on for thousands of years. Japan invaded China, and Li Shimin played a major role.

There are so many Wu Chui in the comment area. It feels like Wu Chui never went to school. Is Wu Zetian worthy of being in the top ten in history? Regarding the points that you have been boasting the most, the first point is that the Asian War was fake. The prototype was that the Turks and Tubo brought a small tribe to fight with Wu Zhou. The scale was only a few hundred thousand people, far less than the two million people Wu Chui said. The second point is that anyone who has gone to school knows that Wu Zhou Tianshu was just Wu Zhou's own pleasure. The third point is that Wu Chui always likes to include the post-Turkic and some independent countries that pretended to surrender.

If you want to read the evaluation of the emperor, you should read the subversion of This Is the Emperor's Chat. After reading this book, I am immune to all books of this type. It's completely **