I Drive an Armed Heavy Truck in the Apocalypse

In the first chapter, I was persuaded to leave, even though I knew there were zombies, I let a stranger get on the bus. If she said she wasn't bitten, then she wasn't bitten? Taking risks for a stranger is a fool. . . This idiot Madonna is so disgusting

The opening plot is very similar to a certain book of the same type, well, so is Goldfinger! But the text is more mature than that one. Is it a work by the same studio?

Writing more words about shortcomings does not mean that the shortcomings far outweigh the advantages. It just means that writing more detailed shortcomings will have more reference value for readers and authors. Advantages: 1. In terms of details, the descriptions of battle scenes are quite detailed. 2. The conspiracy struggles and the ups and downs of the plot are revealed in the framework. Disadvantages: 1. The plot advances too slowly, and half a million words are still lingering on the US-Mexico border. According to the author's writing method, it will probably take four to five million words to finish. 2. The feedback on the sense of growth is mainly expressed through the comparison of ordinary people's battles. The sense of growth is not obvious, but the sense of standing still is very strong. Because the physical quality of the protagonist has soared to the point of being inhuman, the roaring shadow is still howling on one side, and it is painful on the other side wearing earmuffs, which is a bit dumbfounding. 3. The system is too suspenseful and unstable. It has been repeatedly suggested that the system is deliberately guiding, that the system is monitoring the protagonist, that the system's satellite cluster is artificially arranged, and that the protagonist's experience and encounters with passengers are products selected by the system... Brother, you really can't write system articles like this. This is a super bad point in system articles. Your way of writing is conspiracy theory writing, which runs counter to the original intention of systematic writing. The two sets of readers' expectations are completely opposite. Readers of conspiracy theories expect to use the internal connections to seize the fleeting opportunity to break the conspiracy, while readers of system articles expect to use the power outside the world to mechanically descend and carry out dimensionality reduction strikes. Every time I see an author writing about the plotting tendency of a plug-in that the protagonist relies heavily on, I feel like the author is going to be sick. Although the plot of this book is slow to move forward and the plot is not fully revealed yet, it is very disturbing. 4. The characters in the plot used to have a single way of expression. It's basically a flashback, explaining the historical scenes of the characters from a God's perspective. After watching it too much, looking back, I feel that the format is a bit monotonous and boring. 5. Sometimes some operations of the protagonist group are really written a little brainlessly. For example, it is obvious that there are enemies in all directions. The protagonist team will give up the super-era metal protection of the carriage, raise the carriage door, and operate with hand-held equipment, and then almost be hit by the attack. Brother, you are really trying to be on the screen just for the sake of being on the screen. It is very American drama style, but you have to understand that the way words and film and television pictures convey feelings are different. In fact, it's not that the protagonist is brainless in doing this kind of behavior, but it's that when you write it like this, it makes him appear to be brainless. If you ask him to make some preparations in advance for the crisis he may encounter after lifting the car door, and if it really comes in handy later, their image will not be so brainless. PS: The above feelings were obtained when I read this book with a limited membership membership. I felt that it was not meaningful to read this book during the limited time. The battle and conspiracy truth were quite interesting, but it was also a bit tiring and repetitive, and lacked any major excitement. If you have been chasing books, the feeling may be different. This is for reference only. After all, the author's exemption made me read almost in vain, so I still recommend that everyone take a look, it won't hurt.

You can go to the mine for a walk in the future, and then you will open up a new world. Common heavy trucks are all garbage and are younger brothers. Several large movable vehicles in there are very impressive. One wheel is taller than common heavy trucks, so it is best to go there to change tools.

Not bad, the writing is quite delicate. You can try reading it

I'm starting to store my brain and can't stand it anymore.

It's almost exactly the same as the book "I Drive an RV in the End of the World". The system is the same, the start is the same, the only difference is that the background is changed to a Western background.

Brother author, you can do it, come on. I believe you can become a great shooter

Nowadays, the bad AI and studio writers feel really good about it. I hope they won't all be fooled in the future. My personal opinion is for reference. It feels comfortable to read and write. The three of them have too little daily communication. Even if they are leveling up and fighting monsters, they need to take a break. It feels like they are constantly advancing the main plot.

Take your time, don't panic, come on! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Well written