
Three Kingdoms: the Tyrant of the Cao Family Slaughtered the Sima Family at the Beginning
About This Novel
Cao Shuo was reborn in the late Han Dynasty and became Cao Cao's second son. Binding [God Level? Choice? System], there are three options: Mingjun, Renjun, and Tyrant. If you choose the tyrant option at the beginning, you will kill Sima Yi's family. [Ding, the host killed Sima Yi's clan and obtained three thousand Xuanjia troops. Ding, the host kills Zhang Xiu and obtains the overlord's force value. Ding?,? The host killed Yuan Shao, robbed Yuan Shao's daughter-in-law, and obtained one hundred thousand great Qin warriors. ... Yuan Shao: Kill my beloved son, seize my inheritance, rob my daughter-in-law, thug Cao Shuo, you and I are at odds with each other. Liu Bei: I have been benevolent and righteous throughout my life, but I never expected that I would lose to a cruel traitor. I am not willing to accept it. Cao Cao: With this unicorn alone, why worry about not being able to conquer the world?
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(3)Scraped 21d ago
Not bad, very good choice, not bad
This typo, this writing style is simply amazing. The author must be the kind of person who is particularly bad at studying. No matter how bad his writing is, he won't be like this.
Why are they all famous military generals from the Tang Dynasty? [Emot=default,12/]
Rating
Community(0)
Official(3)Scraped 21d ago
Not bad, very good choice, not bad
This typo, this writing style is simply amazing. The author must be the kind of person who is particularly bad at studying. No matter how bad his writing is, he won't be like this.
Why are they all famous military generals from the Tang Dynasty? [Emot=default,12/]
Featured in 66 Booklists
Official(66)
It's been a long time since I've come across an article like this that gives me a hearty feeling after reading it in one sitting. The writing and storyline are great, and the characters are vividly drawn. I like this type of article very much. Vote for it, come on!




The writing style is delicate, complex but not verbose, and the psychological descriptions of many characters are more three-dimensional, with distinctive personalities and reasonable emotions. After reading it, it makes people think about it and recommend it.




It is a book above the standard that people of all tastes can try. It has no shortcomings. If you insist on finding a shortcoming, it is that the number of words is a bit short.




It's been a long time since I've come across an article like this that gives me a hearty feeling after reading it in one sitting. The writing and storyline are great, and the characters are vividly drawn. I like this type of article very much. Vote for it, come on!












