
In the Late Ming Dynasty with the Cavalry and Slashing System
About This Novel
Traveling to the end of tomorrow's Qi Dynasty, Deng Ru obtained the recruitment system for cavalry and cutting. At this moment, the Ming Dynasty was on the verge of collapse, Xizong died, and the last emperor of the Ming Dynasty, Zhu Youjian, was about to visit Dabao. Gao Yingxiang, the first generation king of Chuang, was ready to take action. The Jurchens outside the customs often invaded the borders of the Ming Dynasty and penetrated hundreds of miles into the empire, but no one dared to stop them. Deng Ru led his cavalry and cutting system to raise troops in the prosperous Jiangnan area, showing his fangs to the world. When the Fiona Champion of Badania meets the Archer of the Great Mysterious God. When the armored cavalry of the imperial elite collided with the iron hooves of the Eight Banners outside the pass. When the guards of Kusait Khan were cruising with the Manchu and Mongolian archers. When the Varan crossbowmen and the Mingshen machine battalion lined up to shoot each other. This one of the time points that determines the fate of China will eventually be rewritten.
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(10)Scraped 22d ago
It is suggested to change the name to "Ancient Invincible Literature with Cavalry and Slashing Skin" and replace the cavalry and slashing soldiers with the kind that completes the task and sends 100,000 system soldiers. The result is exactly the same. It can be said that this article has come to an end. We already have the top soldiers, the author cannot write about marching formations, and he has no personal skills, so what else can he write about? Infinite expansion from 1,000 soldiers to 1 million --- So what is the difference between this article and those ancient invincible and brainless articles? Write about daily government affairs---classic ancient family fortune writing. The biggest problem of the author is that he adjusted it too high, which resulted in the top-level soldiers at the beginning and weak follow-up. Secondly, he doesn't know how to write about formations, not to mention riding and slashing. The author's marching formations are only average among all ancient war articles. There are no strategies and no details. How can he support the article with only the grand narrative of war? The reason why the author has been writing about daily life recently is because he knows that if it goes on like this, it will definitely be finished before 50 chapters. Therefore, after relying on the gimmick of riding and slashing in the early stage to attract a wave of people, he can only rely on the number of words to transform into daily life and ancient literature. The result is that it will become mediocre. In fact, writing about riding and slashing is not easy at all. In other words, there is no difference between the riding and slashing system and the invincible system of those inferior online texts, and the invincible writing has not yet excelled. This article is like playing a game of killing a dog and sitting in command. After playing for half an hour, I got tired of it.
suggestion
What I wrote above is okay, but I don't understand why the male protagonist doesn't rob the small rich man when he has 20 dead men. Plug-ins should not give so many dead soldiers, but give them 1 to 5 with no upper limit in strength. You can write one against a hundred, against a thousand, recruit famous generals of that era, recruit infantry for training, etc. Write more about the sinister people's hearts, the male protagonist's backstabbing, etc.
I didn't even understand what I was writing about halfway through. .
Can't pig's feet be upgraded?
I can only recruit troops and upgrade them. What I want to see is my own method! How can I rely on others?
In the mid-term, all the cavalry-cutting soldiers are armored. This is not a flat argument.
It was Mount and Blade, and I actually saw it?
It's still watchable, not as bad as they said.
It feels a bit like a novice, and the writing style is still lacking. Personally, I feel that it is better to write those lord game articles, because I have read a lot of knight-and-blade + history books, and most of them are eunuchs. They do not have deep historical knowledge. It is recommended not to write historical articles. If you cannot write a sense of history, you will easily end up being eunuchs or unfinished later.
It's a lot of nonsense, but it's time and again.
The stronghold has been broken, and I don't dare to do anything for fear of being sealed. Since I'm afraid of the setting, I don't want to be a bandit, but an officer and soldier. It's really uncomfortable to act and stand up again.
It's very embarrassing to watch. You can ride and chop when you want. Recruiting people from the Three Eastern Kingdoms has many types of troops. They are trapped in the camp, riding tigers and leopards, following white horses, and so on. They are all familiar. It's also a no-brainer. You must create a Western fantasy world. No idea what that is. When reading a book, you still need to look up information. .
The subject matter is ok
Come on, the author, the subject matter is okay, and I will add riding and slashing in the late Ming Dynasty.
Rating
Community(0)
Official(10)Scraped 22d ago
It is suggested to change the name to "Ancient Invincible Literature with Cavalry and Slashing Skin" and replace the cavalry and slashing soldiers with the kind that completes the task and sends 100,000 system soldiers. The result is exactly the same. It can be said that this article has come to an end. We already have the top soldiers, the author cannot write about marching formations, and he has no personal skills, so what else can he write about? Infinite expansion from 1,000 soldiers to 1 million --- So what is the difference between this article and those ancient invincible and brainless articles? Write about daily government affairs---classic ancient family fortune writing. The biggest problem of the author is that he adjusted it too high, which resulted in the top-level soldiers at the beginning and weak follow-up. Secondly, he doesn't know how to write about formations, not to mention riding and slashing. The author's marching formations are only average among all ancient war articles. There are no strategies and no details. How can he support the article with only the grand narrative of war? The reason why the author has been writing about daily life recently is because he knows that if it goes on like this, it will definitely be finished before 50 chapters. Therefore, after relying on the gimmick of riding and slashing in the early stage to attract a wave of people, he can only rely on the number of words to transform into daily life and ancient literature. The result is that it will become mediocre. In fact, writing about riding and slashing is not easy at all. In other words, there is no difference between the riding and slashing system and the invincible system of those inferior online texts, and the invincible writing has not yet excelled. This article is like playing a game of killing a dog and sitting in command. After playing for half an hour, I got tired of it.
suggestion
What I wrote above is okay, but I don't understand why the male protagonist doesn't rob the small rich man when he has 20 dead men. Plug-ins should not give so many dead soldiers, but give them 1 to 5 with no upper limit in strength. You can write one against a hundred, against a thousand, recruit famous generals of that era, recruit infantry for training, etc. Write more about the sinister people's hearts, the male protagonist's backstabbing, etc.
I didn't even understand what I was writing about halfway through. .
Can't pig's feet be upgraded?
I can only recruit troops and upgrade them. What I want to see is my own method! How can I rely on others?
In the mid-term, all the cavalry-cutting soldiers are armored. This is not a flat argument.
It was Mount and Blade, and I actually saw it?
It's still watchable, not as bad as they said.
It feels a bit like a novice, and the writing style is still lacking. Personally, I feel that it is better to write those lord game articles, because I have read a lot of knight-and-blade + history books, and most of them are eunuchs. They do not have deep historical knowledge. It is recommended not to write historical articles. If you cannot write a sense of history, you will easily end up being eunuchs or unfinished later.
It's a lot of nonsense, but it's time and again.
The stronghold has been broken, and I don't dare to do anything for fear of being sealed. Since I'm afraid of the setting, I don't want to be a bandit, but an officer and soldier. It's really uncomfortable to act and stand up again.
It's very embarrassing to watch. You can ride and chop when you want. Recruiting people from the Three Eastern Kingdoms has many types of troops. They are trapped in the camp, riding tigers and leopards, following white horses, and so on. They are all familiar. It's also a no-brainer. You must create a Western fantasy world. No idea what that is. When reading a book, you still need to look up information. .
The subject matter is ok
Come on, the author, the subject matter is okay, and I will add riding and slashing in the late Ming Dynasty.









